Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Entrapment, Culpability, and Legitimacy.Hochan Kim - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (1):67-91.
    In this paper, I offer a novel account of entrapment. This account suggests that the wrongness of pursuing punishment in cases of entrapment consists of two distinct components, one concerning the culpability of the entrapped defendant and the other concerning the legitimacy of the entrapping state to prosecute crimes that it has effectively created. Distinguishing these two components of entrapment, I explain, helps to clarify the moral issues at stake and to resolve some confusions and debates in existing legal analyses (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Entrapment, temptation and virtue testing.Daniel J. Hill, Stephen K. McLeod & Attila Tanyi - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2429–2447.
    We address the ethics of scenarios in which one party entraps, intentionally tempts or intentionally tests the virtue of another. We classify, in a new manner, three distinct types of acts that are of concern, namely acts of entrapment, of intentional temptation and of virtue testing. Our classification is, for each kind of scenario, of itself neutral concerning the question whether the agent acts permissibly. We explain why acts of entrapment are more ethically objectionable than like acts of intentional temptation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A limited defense of what some will regard as entrapment.Richard L. Lippke - 2017 - Legal Theory 23 (4):283-306.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • What is the Incoherence Objection to Legal Entrapment?Daniel J. Hill, Stephen K. McLeod & Attila Tanyi - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 22 (1):47-73.
    Some legal theorists say that legal entrapment to commit a crime is incoherent. So far, there is no satisfactorily precise statement of this objection in the literature: it is obscure even as to the type of incoherence that is purportedly involved. (Perhaps consequently, substantial assessment of the objection is also absent.) We aim to provide a new statement of the objection that is more precise and more rigorous than its predecessors. We argue that the best form of the objection asserts (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Neither Confirm nor Deny: Secrecy and Disclosure in Undercover Policing.Katerina Hadjimatheou - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (3):279-296.
    Recent scandals in U.K. undercover policing have prompted a public re-examination of the basis for continued secrecy with respect to cases in which serious historical misconduct is suspected. As pa...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•