Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ownership of Genetic Data: Between Universalism and Contextualism?Henri-Corto Stoeklé & Christian Hervé - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):75-77.
    The article by Dupras and Bunnik. makes a fundamental contribution in the context of the current boom in personalized medicine. We propose an additional crit...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Scrutinizing Privacy in Multi-Omics Research: How to Provide Ethical Grounding for the Identification of Privacy-Relevant Data Properties.C. W. Safarlou, A. L. Bredenoord, R. Vermeulen & K. R. Jongsma - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):73-75.
    The outline of a framework for assessing privacy risks in multi-omic research and databases provided by Dupras and Bunnik is a valuable contribution to the literature on the ethics of omics data. T...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Whose Data Are They Anyway? Identification of Relatives and Genetic Exceptionalism.Robert I. Field - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):78-79.
    In developing a framework for assessing privacy risks, Dupras and Bunnik’s “Toward a framework for assessing privacy risks in multi-omic research and databases” considers the question of whe...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases.Charles Dupras & Eline M. Bunnik - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-6.
    In ‘Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases’ (Dupras and Bunnik 2021), we argued against the assessment of privacy risks and protection requirements base...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Whose Data, Whose Risk? Omics Privacy Concerns Should be Defined by Individuals, not Researchers.Sabrina F. Derrington, Matthew A. Deardorff, Alexander R. Judkins & Xiaowu Gai - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):67-70.
    The framework proposed by Dupras and Bunnik was developed in response to their recognition that standard regulations are increasingly inadequate to address the complex privacy issues created by the...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Exceptionalism, Information Categories and the Relevance of Gender.Ruth Chadwick - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):65-67.
    Dupras and Bunnik take on the particular privacy risks of multi-omics, in particular via a contrast and comparison of genomics and epigenomics, followed by a consideration of the issues in r...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Data Properties or Analytical Methodologies: Too Much Attention to the Former Ignores Concerns About the Latter.Mathias Brochhausen & D. Micah Hester - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):70-72.
    The paper by Dupras and Bunnik is a useful addition to the literature on privacy in regards to datasets of human tissue/materials. In particular, the paper addresses import...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Dupras and Bunnik’s Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases Still Too Exceptionalist?Karla Alex & Eva C. Winkler - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):80-82.
    Dupras and Bunnik’s strong statement against the normative approach of genetic exceptionalism, which can no longer be justified in the midst of multi-omic research, is of great importance fo...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation