Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Control Paradox: From Ai to Populism

Rowman & Littlefield International (2020)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Risk and Responsibility in Context.Adriana Placani & Stearns Broadhead (eds.) - 2023 - New York: Routledge.
    This volume bridges contemporary philosophical conceptions of risk and responsibility and offers an extensive examination of the topic. It shows that risk and responsibility combine in ways that give rise to new philosophical questions and problems. Philosophical interest in the relationship between risk and responsibility continues to rise, due in no small part due to environmental crises, emerging technologies, legal developments, and new medical advances. Despite such interest, scholars are just now working out how to conceive of the links between (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The public health theory of populism.Ezio Di Nucci - 2023 - Bioethics 37 (8):748-755.
    Successful public health interventions have, in recent decades, improved the health of the working classes in significant ways across much of the western world. Nevertheless, here, I argue that populist electoral breakthroughs over the last decade may be considered side-effects of ‘successful’ public health policies: crucially, the claim is that those political side-effects resulted because of—rather than despite—the health-measured success of those public health interventions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Limits of Responsibility? [REVIEW]Ezio Di Nucci - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):317-319.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Tragic Choices and the Virtue of Techno-Responsibility Gaps.John Danaher - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (2):1-26.
    There is a concern that the widespread deployment of autonomous machines will open up a number of ‘responsibility gaps’ throughout society. Various articulations of such techno-responsibility gaps have been proposed over the years, along with several potential solutions. Most of these solutions focus on ‘plugging’ or ‘dissolving’ the gaps. This paper offers an alternative perspective. It argues that techno-responsibility gaps are, sometimes, to be welcomed and that one of the advantages of autonomous machines is that they enable us to embrace (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations