Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ne Hic Saltaveris: The Marxian Theory of Exploitation After Roemer: Gilbert L. Skillman.Gilbert L. Skillman - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):309-331.
    In his book A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, John Roemer employs the tools of mainstream general equilibrium and game-theoretic analysis to develop a fundamental critique and broadbased reformulation of Marxian economic theory. Perhaps Roemer's most striking departure from traditional Marxian tenets lies in his explanation of the material basis of exploitation in capitalist economies. Roemer argues that capitalist exploitation must be understood as essentially the consequence of exchange given differential ownership of relatively scarce productive assets. In particular, Roemer (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • In defence of exploitation.Justin Schwartz - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):275--307.
    Roemer's attempt to undermine the normative reasons that Marxists have thought exploitation important (domination, alienation, and inequality) is vitiated by several crucial errors. First, Roemer ignores the dimension of freedom which is Marx's main concern and replaces it with an interest in justice, which Marx rejected. This leads him to misconstrue the nature of exploitation as Marx understands it. Second, his procedure for disconnecting these evils from exploitation, or denying their importance, involves the methodological assumption that exploitation must strictly imply (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What Walrasian Marxism Can and Cannot Do.John Roemer - 1992 - Economics and Philosophy 8 (1):149-156.
    In their article “Roemer's ‘General’ Theory of Exploitation is a Special Case: The Limits of Walrasian Marxism,” Devine and Dymski portray me as some sort of Walrasian automaton who believes that phenomena that are not easily modelled using the Walrasian model of perfect competition do not exist. Their criticism of my theory assumes that I was attempting to model capitalism in its entirety, a task that, I agree, I failed to do. I did not propose a theory of accumulation, or (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation