Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Other‐Sacrificing Options.Benjamin Lange - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):612-629.
    I argue that you can be permitted to discount the interests of your adversaries even though doing so would be impartially suboptimal. This means that, in addition to the kinds of moral options that the literature traditionally recognises, there exist what I call other-sacrificing options. I explore the idea that you cannot discount the interests of your adversaries as much as you can favour the interests of your intimates; if this is correct, then there is an asymmetry between negative partiality (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Nameless, Faceless, Selfless: Can the Utilitarian Terrorist Possess Integrity?Roman Briggs - 2019 - The Pluralist 14 (3):51-77.
    Selfhood requires sufficient rationality, the capacities for self-reflection and self-knowledge, the capacity for autonomous action, temporal situatedness and an awareness of this, and psychological continuity and an awareness of this. Contemporary philosophers have more or less reached a consensus regarding NS, and the lion's share of discourse regarding the self seems to center on making sense of this constellation.While certainly having their own respective places within such discussions, value and commitment too often take a back seat. Here, I return attention (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • バーナード・ウィリアムズの功利主義批判再考 (Bernard Williams’ Critique of Utilitarianism Reconsidered).Kazuki Watanabe - 2021 - Japanese Student Research Notes of Philosophy of Science 4:17-25.
    This research discusses Bernard Williams' critique of utilitarianism. I will address Williams' well-known “Integrity Objection” and clarify where his main issue with utilitarianism lies. Through this, I will demonstrate that the separation of the two viewpoints – the “inside viewpoint” and the “impartial viewpoint” - is the issue, as the utilitarian impartial viewpoint does not capture the value of ethical deliberations based on our inside viewpoint in which we presuppose our personal projects. Furthermore, I will argue that this interpretation enables (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consecuencialismo y relatividad evaluativa.Francisco Lara Sánchez - 1995 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 14:135.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark