For the past 15 years, scholars in education have focused on Levinas’s work largely in terms of his understanding of alterity, of the self-Other relation, of ethics as ‘first philosophy’ and the significance these concepts have on rethinking educational theory and practice. What I do in this paper, by way of method, is to start from a slightly different place, from the assertion that there is indeed something ‘new’ to be explored in Levinas’s philosophy – both in terms of ideas (...) to be found within his work, and also in terms of the demands educational ideas and practices place on his work from without. That is, how does the actual, lived specificity of educational encounters occasion a different set of questions than one would otherwise pose if thinking only from within the discipline of philosophy, or from a purely theoretical point of view? In light of this, this paper explores Levinas’s ideas of sensibility, materiality, and embodiment. I see these not simply as supports for his ethical thought, but as the very core of incarnation without which his ethics makes no sense. I propose that these ideas are quintessentially pedagogical aspects of his thought – that is, they are always already rooted in a relational context of change and alteration of the subject. (shrink)

Šiame straipsnyje interpretuojamos vandens ir plaukimo alegorijos, kurios leidžia sukurti ateities mokyklos projektą, pasižymintį glotnia erdve, apie kurią kalbėjo Deleuze’as. Deleuze’o įžvalgų užuomazgų randama kitų filosofų, inspiravusių Deleuze’o alegorines figūras, veikaluose. Minėtieji konceptai yra tiesiogiai ar metaforiškai susiję su ugdymo lauku ir mokymusi, t. y. pakartojimu ir kūrybiškumu, giliu nardymu ir plūduriavimu paviršiuje, atsipalaidavimu ir dėmesio sukaupimu, balansavimu tarp plataus ir lokalaus veiksmų lauko, skirtingų judėjimo trajektorijų pasirinkimo. Kitokia, atsinaujinti tinkama, mokyklos erdvė šiame straipsnyje įsivaizduojama kaip potvynio teritorija – tai (...) reiškia tam tikrą chaosą, daiktų padėties pasikeitimą. Visa tai leidžia deteritorizuoti erdvę nepažeidžiant jos ribų. Aptariami Deleuze’o išskirti keturi pavojai – baimė, aiškumas, galia ir šleikštulys, kurie paralyžiuoja kūrybinę potenciją ir inovatyvumą. Straipsnyje svarstoma, ką gi šie pavojai reikštų įsivaizduojamoje mokykloje, apimtoje potvynio, ir kaip jie keistų mokyklos veikėjų elgesį. (shrink)

If the purpose of philosophy is creating concepts that make it possible to think differently, education surely needs philosophical assistance. Sketching a Deleuzian approach to education, this article explores a practice of thinking about and performing ‘school,’ ‘teacher,’ and ‘learning’ differently. A complex social situation such as a school needs routines and clear role expectations, to ensure efficient action. How do we resist, nonetheless, that concepts aimed at thinking education just redouble an already existing practice by submitting to explain everyday (...) and policy-induced practice. Suggesting an understanding of theory and the construction of concepts as a much wider endeavor, the article introduces concepts such as strata, Bodies without Organs, order machines, and desire. With reference to education, it hints at a creative endeavor to explore potential lines of flight, and exploit cracks and inconsistencies in current school regimes, when they no longer appear appropriate. In this spirit, the ‘competence nomad’ is proposed as a conceptual persona that may help thought to connect and plug into new becomings, by means of alternative tactics in current learning environments that are already heavily traversed by existing schooling order machines. (shrink)