Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The ethics of self-tracking. A comprehensive review of the literature.Michał Wieczorek, Fiachra O'Brolchain, Yashar Saghai & Bert Gordijn - 2022 - Ethics and Behavior 33 (4):239-271.
    This paper presents a literature review on the ethics of self-tracking technologies which are utilized by users to monitor parameters related to their activity and bodily parameters. By examining a total of 65 works extracted through a systematic database search and backwards snowballing, the authors of this review discuss three categories of opportunities and ten categories of concerns currently associated with self-tracking. The former include empowerment and well-being, contribution to health goals, and solidarity. The latter are social harms, privacy and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Let's Move Beyond Critique—But Please, Let's Not Depoliticize the Debate.Tamar Sharon - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):20-22.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Algorithmic Bloodhounds.Evan Selinger & Brett Frischmann - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):24-26.
    In “The Quantified Relationship” John Danaher, Sven Nyholm, and Brian Earp (2018) significantly enhance normative discussions about quantified relationships and their core technologies. Our modest...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Infotality: On Living, Loving, and Dying Through Information.Joel Michael Reynolds - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):33-35.
    Responding to Danaher et al. on self-tracking technologies, I argue that human lived experience is becoming increasingly mediated by generalized, statistical information, which I term our "infotality." Drawing on the work of Foucault, I argue that infotality is historically novel and best understood as the product of biopolitics, healthism, and informatics. I then critique the authors' "stance of cautious openness,” which misunderstands the aims of the technology in question and the fundamental ambiguity of the role information plays in the achievement (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies and Quantified Relationship Technologies: Overlapping Ethical Concerns.Sven Nyholm, Brian D. Earp & John Danaher - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):167-170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • El Gran Teatro del Mundo.Emilio Mordini - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):37-38.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Relational Autonomy and the Quantified Relationship.Hannah Martens & Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):39-40.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Phallus-y Fallacy: On Unsexy Intimate Tracking.Karen Levy - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):22-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Phenomenological Considerations of Sex Tracking Technology.Karola Kreitmair - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):31-33.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • I, My Love, and Apps.Craig Klugman - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):1-2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Politics of Quantified Relationships.Gordon Hull - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):29-30.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Swiping Left on the Quantified Relationship: Exploring the Potential Soft Impacts.Lily Frank & Michał Klincewicz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):27-28.
  • The Benefits and Risks of Quantified Relationship Technologies: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Quantified Relationship”.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-6.
    The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations