Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities.Róbert Sabo, Štefan Beňuš, Viktória Kevická, Marian Trnka, Milan Rusko, Sakhia Darjaa & Jay Kejriwal - forthcoming - Human Affairs.
    Spoken communication between social robotic devices, powered by generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, and the senior population offers great potential for researching social interaction and robot identity perceptions as well as exploring the potential opportunities and challenges when implementing this human-machine interactions in real life situations and health care. In this paper we explore people’s perceptions of the social robot Furhat when administering verbal tasks similar to those used in screening for Alzheimer’s disease. We describe the Slovak system mounted (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Integrative social robotics, value-driven design, and transdisciplinarity.Johanna Seibt, Malene Flensborg Damholdt & Christina Vestergaard - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (1):111-144.
    “Integrative Social Robotics” (ISR) is a new approach or general method for generating social robotics applications in a responsible and “culturally sustainable” fashion. Currently social robotics is caught in a basic difficulty we call the “triple gridlock of description, evaluation, and regulation”. We briefly recapitulate this problem and then present the core ideas of ISR in the form of five principles that should guide the development of applications in social robotics. Characteristic of ISR is to intertwine a mixed method approach (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • AI as a boss? A national US survey of predispositions governing comfort with expanded AI roles in society.Kate K. Mays, Yiming Lei, Rebecca Giovanetti & James E. Katz - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (4):1587-1600.
    People’s comfort with and acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI) instantiations is a topic that has received little systematic study. This is surprising given the topic’s relevance to the design, deployment and even regulation of AI systems. To help fill in our knowledge base, we conducted mixed-methods analysis based on a survey of a representative sample of the US population (_N_ = 2254). Results show that there are two distinct social dimensions to comfort with AI: as a peer and as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots : The attitudes towards social robots scale.Malene Flensborg Damholdt, Christina Vestergaard, Marco Nørskov, Raul Hakli, Stefan Larsen & Johanna Seibt - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (1):24-56.
    Background: The surge in the development of social robots gives rise to an increased need for systematic methods of assessing attitudes towards robots. Aim: This study presents the development of a questionnaire for assessing attitudinal stance towards social robots: the ASOR. Methods: The 37-item ASOR questionnaire was developed by a task-force with members from different disciplines. It was founded on theoretical considerations of how social robots could influence five different aspects of relatedness. Results: Three hundred thirty-nine people responded to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots.Malene Flensborg Damholdt, Christina Vestergaard, Marco Nørskov, Raul Hakli, Stefan Larsen & Johanna Seibt - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (1):24-56.
    Background: The surge in the development of social robots gives rise to an increased need for systematic methods of assessing attitudes towards robots. Aim: This study presents the development of a questionnaire for assessing attitudinal stance towards social robots: the ASOR. Methods: The 37-item ASOR questionnaire was developed by a task-force with members from different disciplines. It was founded on theoretical considerations of how social robots could influence five different aspects of relatedness. Results: Three hundred thirty-nine people responded to the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation