Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Organic and tight.J. Cummings, M. Foreman & E. Schimmerling - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):22-32.
    We define organic sets and organically stationary sequences, which generalize tight sets and tightly stationary sequences respectively. We show that there are stationary many inorganic sets and stationary many sets that are organic but not tight. Working in the Constructible Universe, we give a characterization of organic and tight sets in terms of fine structure. We answer a related question posed in [J. Cummings, M. Foreman, M. Magidor, Canonical structure in the universe of set theory: Part two, Ann. Pure Appl. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The tree property at [image].Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):279 - 290.
    We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at $\aleph_{\omega + 1}$ . This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor—Shelah [7].
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
    The tree property at κ+ states that there are no Aronszajn trees on κ+, or, equivalently, that every κ+ tree has a cofinal branch. For singular strong limit cardinals κ, there is tension between the tree property at κ+ and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at κ; the former is typically the result of the presence of strongly compact cardinals in the background, and the latter is impossible above strongly compacts. In this paper, we reconcile the two. We prove (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Forcing Closed Unbounded Subsets of אω1+1.M. C. Stanley - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (3):681-707.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The tree property at ℵ ω+1.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):279-290.
    We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at ℵω+1. This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor—Shelah [7].
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at ℵω2.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (3):934-946.
    We show that given ù many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which the tree property holds at ℵ ω²+1 and the SCH fails at ℵ ω².
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Some Problems in Singular Cardinals Combinatorics.Matthew Foreman - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (3):309-322.
    This paper attempts to present and organize several problems in the theory of Singular Cardinals. The most famous problems in the area (bounds for the ℶ-function at singular cardinals) are well known to all mathematicians with even a rudimentary interest in set theory. However, it is less well known that the combinatorics of singular cardinals is a thriving area with results and problems that do not depend on a solution of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis. We present here an annotated collection (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The PCF Conjecture and Large Cardinals.Luís Pereira - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):674 - 688.
    We prove that a combinatorial consequence of the negation of the PCF conjecture for intervals, involving free subsets relative to set mappings, is not implied by even the strongest known large cardinal axiom.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Good and bad points in scales.Chris Lambie-Hanson - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (7-8):749-777.
    We address three questions raised by Cummings and Foreman regarding a model of Gitik and Sharon. We first analyze the PCF-theoretic structure of the Gitik–Sharon model, determining the extent of good and bad scales. We then classify the bad points of the bad scales existing in both the Gitik–Sharon model and other models containing bad scales. Finally, we investigate the ideal of subsets of singular cardinals of countable cofinality carrying good scales.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Namba forcing and no good scale.John Krueger - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (3):785-802.
  • Global square and mutual stationarity at the ℵn.Peter Koepke & Philip D. Welch - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (10):787-806.
    We give the proof of a theorem of Jensen and Zeman on the existence of a global □ sequence in the Core Model below a measurable cardinal κ of Mitchell order ) equal to κ++, and use it to prove the following theorem on mutual stationarity at n.Let ω1 denote the first uncountable cardinal of V and set to be the class of ordinals of cofinality ω1.TheoremIf every sequence n m. In particular, there is such a model in which for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Diagonal Prikry extensions.James Cummings & Matthew Foreman - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (4):1383-1402.
  • Tight stationarity and tree-like scales.William Chen - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (10):1019-1036.
  • On the relationship between mutual and tight stationarity.William Chen-Mertens & Itay Neeman - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic:102963.
    We construct a model where every increasing ω-sequence of regular cardinals carries a mutually stationary sequence which is not tightly stationary, and show that this property is preserved under a class of Prikry-type forcings. Along the way, we give examples in the Cohen and Prikry models of ω-sequences of regular cardinals for which there is a non-tightly stationary sequence of stationary subsets consisting of cofinality ω_1 ordinals, and show that such stationary sequences are mutually stationary in the presence of interleaved (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On singular stationarity II.Omer Ben-Neria - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (1):320-342.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Remarks on Gitik's model and symmetric extensions on products of the Lévy collapse.Amitayu Banerjee - 2020 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 66 (3):259-279.
    We improve on results and constructions by Apter, Dimitriou, Gitik, Hayut, Karagila, and Koepke concerning large cardinals, ultrafilters, and cofinalities without the axiom of choice. In particular, we show the consistency of the following statements from certain assumptions: the first supercompact cardinal can be the first uncountable regular cardinal, all successors of regular cardinals are Ramsey, every sequence of stationary sets in is mutually stationary, an infinitary Chang conjecture holds for the cardinals, and all are singular. In each of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Combinatorial properties and dependent choice in symmetric extensions based on Lévy collapse.Amitayu Banerjee - 2022 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 62 (3):369-399.
    We work with symmetric extensions based on Lévy collapse and extend a few results of Apter, Cody, and Koepke. We prove a conjecture of Dimitriou from her Ph.D. thesis. We also observe that if V is a model of $$\textsf {ZFC}$$ ZFC, then $$\textsf {DC}_{<\kappa }$$ DC < κ can be preserved in the symmetric extension of V in terms of symmetric system $$\langle {\mathbb {P}},{\mathcal {G}},{\mathcal {F}}\rangle $$ ⟨ P, G, F ⟩, if $${\mathbb {P}}$$ P is $$\kappa $$ (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark