Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What and where is the unconditioned (or conditioned) stimulus in the conditioning model of neurosis?Marvin Zuckerman - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):187-188.
  • Short-latency avoidance responses.Kazimierz Zieliński - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):186-187.
  • “Prepared fears” and the theory of conditioning.Wanda Wyrwicka - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):186-186.
  • A critique of Eysenck's theory of neurosis.Paul T. P. Wong - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):185-186.
  • The Eysenck and the Wolpe theories of neurosis.Joseph Wolpe - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):184-185.
  • Implications of recent research in conditioning for the conditioning model of neurosis.William S. Terry - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):183-184.
  • Conditioned alpha fear responses and protection from extinction.S. Soltysik - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):182-183.
  • Learning, awareness, and instruction: Subjective contingency awareness does matter in the colour-word contingency learning paradigm.James R. Schmidt & Jan De Houwer - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (4):1754-1768.
    In three experiments, each of a set colour-unrelated distracting words was presented most often in a particular target print colour . In Experiment 1, half of the participants were told the word-colour contingencies in advance and half were not . The instructed group showed a larger learning effect. This instruction effect was fully explained by increases in subjective awareness with instruction. In Experiment 2, contingency instructions were again given, but no contingencies were actually present. Although many participants claimed to be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Modeling neurosis: one type of learning is not enough.Kurt Salzinger - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):181-182.
  • Thesis and antithesis: S-R levers or meaning-perceivers?Ted L. Rosenthal - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):181-181.
  • Journey into the interior of the organism.Howard Rachlin - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):180-181.
  • Toward an unpdated model of neurosis.J. M. Notterman - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):178-179.
  • The propositional nature of human associative learning.Chris J. Mitchell, Jan De Houwer & Peter F. Lovibond - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):183-198.
    The past 50 years have seen an accumulation of evidence suggesting that associative learning depends on high-level cognitive processes that give rise to propositional knowledge. Yet, many learning theorists maintain a belief in a learning mechanism in which links between mental representations are formed automatically. We characterize and highlight the differences between the propositional and link approaches, and review the relevant empirical evidence. We conclude that learning is the consequence of propositional reasoning processes that cooperate with the unconscious processes involved (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   82 citations  
  • New perspectives on conditioning models and incubation theory.Susan Mineka - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):178-178.
  • Fear expression and return of fear following threat instruction with or without direct contingency experience.Gaëtan Mertens, Manuel Kuhn, An K. Raes, Raffael Kalisch, Jan De Houwer & Tina B. Lonsdorf - 2016 - Cognition and Emotion 30 (5).
  • Are the concepts of enhancement and preparedness necessary?Wallace R. McAllister & Dorothy E. McAllister - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):177-178.
  • Conditioning models for clinical syndromes are out of date.Isaac Marks - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):175-177.
  • Reflections on the conditioning model of neurosi.Michael J. Mahoney - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):174-175.
  • On some key concepts in Eysenck's conditioning theory of neurosis.William Lyons - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):174-174.
  • A reconsideration of Eysenck's conditioning model of neurosis.Donald J. Levis - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):172-174.
  • Eysenck on Watson: paying lip service to lip service.Leonard Krasner - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):172-172.
  • Eysenck's model of neurotigenesis.H. D. Kimmel - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):171-172.
  • On the sufficiency of a Pavlovian conditioning model for coping with the complexities of neurosis.Arne Öhman & Holger Ursin - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):179-180.
  • Is there any need for conditioning in Eysenck's conditioning model of neurosis?Jeffrey A. Gray - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):169-171.
  • I Like It, but I'm Not Sure Why: Can Evaluative Conditioning Occur without Conscious Awareness?Andy P. Field - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):13-36.
    There is good evidence that, in general, autonomic conditioning in humans occurs only when subjects can verbalize the contingencies of conditioning. However, one form of conditioning, evaluative conditioning (EC), seems exceptional in that a growing body of evidence suggests that it can occur without conscious contingency awareness. As such, EC offers a unique insight into what role contingency awareness might play in associative learning. Despite this evidence, there are reasons to doubt that evaluative conditioning can occur without conscious awareness. This (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The conditioning theory of neurosis: criticisms considered.H. J. Eysenck - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):188-199.
  • The conditioning model of neurosis.H. J. Eysenck - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):155-166.
    The long-term persistence of neurotic symptoms, such as anxiety, poses difficult problems for any psychological theory. An attempt is made to revive the Watson-Mowrer conditioning theory and to avoid the many criticisms directed against it in the past. It is suggested that recent research has produced changes in learning theory that can be used to render this possible. In the first place, the doctrine of equipotentiality has been shown to be wrong, and some such concept as Seligman's “preparedness” is required, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • The Gantt and Eysenck conditioning models for neurosis.Roscoe A. Dykman - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):168-169.
  • Incubation and the relevance of functional CS exposure.T. D. Borkovec - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):168-168.
  • The nonextinction of fear: operation bootstrap.Robert C. Bolles - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):167-168.
  • Conditioning theory and neurosis.Dalbir Bindra - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):166-167.
  • Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal–culture interface.Roy F. Baumeister & E. J. Masicampo - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (3):945-971.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Voluntary behavior in cognitive and motor tasks.Heidi Kloos & Guy Van Orden - 2010 - Mind and Matter 8 (1):19-43.
    Many previous treatments of voluntary behavior have viewed intentions as causes of behavior. This has resulted in several dilemmas, including a dilemma concerning the origin of intentions. The present article circumvents traditional dilemmas by treating intentions as constraints that restrict degrees of freedom for behavior. Constraints self-organize as temporary dynamic structures that span the mind-body divide. This treatment of intentions and voluntary behavior yields a theory of intentionality that is consistent with existing findings and supported by current research.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations