Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Legislating Privilege.Marc S. Spindelman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):24-33.
    Serious concerns about pervasive, persistent, and unjustified social inequalities have prompted a small—but growing—number of academic commentators to raise some hard and troubling questions for those who would like to legalize physician-assisted suicide. In various ways, these commentators have asked: In light of existing social inequalities—inequalities that operate, for example, along sometimes intersecting lines of race, class, age, sex, and disability—how persuasive are autonomy-based arguments in favor of legalization of assisted suicide when those arguments depend on a conception of autonomy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Legislating Privilege.Marc S. Spindelman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):24-33.
    Serious concerns about pervasive, persistent, and unjustified social inequalities have prompted a small—but growing—number of academic commentators to raise some hard and troubling questions for those who would like to legalize physician-assisted suicide. In various ways, these commentators have asked: In light of existing social inequalities—inequalities that operate, for example, along sometimes intersecting lines of race, class, age, sex, and disability—how persuasive are autonomy-based arguments in favor of legalization of assisted suicide when those arguments depend on a conception of autonomy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Need to Specify the Difference "Difference" Makes.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):34-37.
  • The Need to Specify the Difference “Difference” Makes.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):34-37.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Oregon's experience: Evaluating the record.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):19 – 27.
    Prior to passage of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, opponents of assistance in dying argued that legalization would have serious harmful consequences. Specifically, they argued that the quality and availability of palliative care would decline, that the harms of legalization would affect certain vulnerable groups disproportionately, that legal assisted dying could not be confined to the competent terminally ill who voluntarily request assistance, and that the practice would result in frequent abuses. Data from Oregon's decade-long experience decisively refute the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations