Switch to: References

Citations of:

Introduction: Why Biopower? Why Now?

In Vernon W. Cisney & Nicolae Morar (eds.), Biopower: Foucault and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. pp. 1-26 (2015)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Measuring non-Han bodies: Anthropometry, colonialism, and biopower in China's south-western borderland in the 1930s and 1940s.Jing Zhu - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (3-4):84-112.
    This article examines the biopower of non-Han bodies by considering the intersections of anthropology, racial science, and colonial regimes. During the 1930s and 1940s, when extensive anthropometric research was being undertaken on non-Han populations in the south-western borderlands of China, several anthropologists studied non-Han groups under the aegis of frontier administration. Chinese scholars sought to generate the physical characteristics of ethnic minority groups in the south-west of China through the methodology of body measurement, in order to identify forms of social (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reflexive Biopolitics and the Structure of Experimental Knowledge.Justas Patkauskas - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (5):755-781.
    Over the last 20 years, biopolitics has become an established research field within the humanities and the social sciences. However, scholars agree that the academic status of biopolitics remains problematic due to the latter’s conceptual fuzziness, unmanageable scope and weak foundations. To address these issues, biopolitics theorists have engaged in reflexive efforts to convert biopolitics into a respectable discipline with a clear definition, research agenda and canon. In this article, I examine the reflexive biopolitics scholarship that has emerged in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reflexive Biopolitics and the Structure of Experimental Knowledge.Justas Patkauskas - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (5):755-781.
    Over the last 20 years, biopolitics has become an established research field within the humanities and the social sciences. However, scholars agree that the academic status of biopolitics remains problematic due to the latter’s conceptual fuzziness, unmanageable scope and weak foundations. To address these issues, biopolitics theorists have engaged in reflexive efforts to convert biopolitics into a respectable discipline with a clear definition, research agenda and canon. In this article, I examine the reflexive biopolitics scholarship that has emerged in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Science, Politics and the Production of Biological Knowledge: New Trends and Old Challenges: Jonathan Marks: Is Science Racist? Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017, 142 pp, Hardcover €44.74, ISBN: 9780745689210 Maurizio Meloni: Political Biology. Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 2016, 284 pp, Hardcover $150.00, ISBN: 9780199692026. [REVIEW]Abigail Nieves Delgado - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):467-473.
    In the history of biology, knowledge about human differences often has been produced through an interaction with politics and values assumed to be external to science. Two recent books—Jonathan Marks’ Is Science Racist? and Maurizio Meloni’s Political Biology—shed new light on this interplay. While Marks looks into the field of anthropology, Meloni offers a historiographical view on the soft-hard heredity debate. Based on these new contributions, this essay addresses a number of current ways in which society and science conceptualize human (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark