Switch to: References

Citations of:

Vestiges of the natural history of creation and other evolutionary writings

Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by James A. Secord (1844)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. T. H. Huxley's Criticism of German Cell Theory: An Epigenetic and Physiological Interpretation of Cell Structure. [REVIEW]Marsha L. Richmond - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):247 - 289.
    In 1853, the young Thomas Henry Huxley published a long review of German cell theory in which he roundly criticized the basic tenets of the Schleiden-Schwann model of the cell. Although historians of cytology have dismissed Huxley's criticism as based on an erroneous interpretation of cell physiology, the review is better understood as a contribution to embryology. "The Cell-theory" presents Huxley's "epigenetic" interpretation of histological organization emerging from changes in the protoplasm to replace the "preformationist" cell theory of Schleiden and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Darwin and Cirripedia Prior to 1846: Exploring the Origins of the Barnacle Research. [REVIEW]Alan C. Love - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):251-289.
    Phillip Sloan has thoroughly documented the importance of Darwin's general invertebrate research program in the period from 1826 to 1836 and demonstrated how it had an impact on his conversion to transformism. Although Darwin later spent eight years of his life investigating barnacles, this period has received less treatment in studies of Darwin and the development of his thought. The most prominent question for the barnacle period that has been attended to is why Darwin "delayed" in publishing his theory of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Darwin’s Methodological Evolution.James G. Lennox - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (1):85-99.
    A necessary condition for having a revolution named after you is that you are an innovator in your field. I argue that if Charles Darwin meets this condition, it is as a philosopher and methodologist. In 1991, I made the case for Darwin's innovative use of "thought experiment" in the "Origin." Here I place this innovative practice in the context of Darwin's methodological commitments, trace its origins back into Darwin's notebooks, and pursue Darwin's suggestion that it owes its inspiration to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations