Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Towards a dynamic connectionist model of memory.Douglas Vickers & Michael D. Lee - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):40-41.
    Glenberg's account falls short in several respects. Besides requiring clearer explication of basic concepts, his account fails to recognize the autonomous nature of perception. His account of what is remembered, and its description, is too static. His strictures against connectionist modeling might be overcome by combining the notions of psychological space and principled learning in an embodied and situated network.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom‐up model of skill learning.Edward Merrillb & Todd Petersonb - 2001 - Cognitive Science 25 (2):203-244.
    This paper presents a skill learning model CLARION. Different from existing models of mostly high-level skill learning that use a top-down approach (that is, turning declarative knowledge into procedural knowledge through practice), we adopt a bottom-up approach toward low-level skill learning, where procedural knowledge develops first and declarative knowledge develops later. Our model is formed by integrating connectionist, reinforcement, and symbolic learning methods to perform on-line reactive learning. It adopts a two-level dual-representation framework (Sun, 1995), with a combination of localist (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • Towards an evolutionary framework for human cognitive neuroscience.Boris M. Velichkovsky - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (1):3-6.
  • Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information.Alp Aslan & Karl-Heinz T. Bäuml - 2012 - Cognition 122 (1):118-122.
  • On the perceptual specificity of memory representations.Eyal Reingold - 2002 - Memory 10 (5/6):365-379.
    The present paradigm involved manipulating the congruency of the perceptual processing during the study and test phases of a recognition memory task. During each trial, a gaze-contingent window was used to limit the stimulus display to a region either inside or outside a 108 square centred on the participant’s point of gaze, constituting the Central and Peripheral viewing modes respectively. The window position changed in real time in concert with changes in gaze position. Four experiments documented better task performance when (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations