Switch to: References

Citations of:

The problem of non-conclusiveness

Topoi 21 (1-2):75-86 (2002)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning.Heinrich Wansing (ed.) - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
    This volume is dedicated to Prof. Dag Prawitz and his outstanding contributions to philosophical and mathematical logic. Prawitz's eminent contributions to structural proof theory, or general proof theory, as he calls it, and inference-based meaning theories have been extremely influential in the development of modern proof theory and anti-realistic semantics. In particular, Prawitz is the main author on natural deduction in addition to Gerhard Gentzen, who defined natural deduction in his PhD thesis published in 1934. The book opens with an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Meaning and Assertibility: Some Reflections on Paolo Casalegno's ‘The Problem of Non‐conclusiveness’.Crispin Wright - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):249-266.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Wright and Casalegno on Meaning and Assertibility.Timothy Williamson - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):267-271.
    In Crispin Wright's ‘Meaning and Assertibility’, the main point of disagreement with Paolo Casalegno's critique of verificationist semantics in ‘The Problem of Non-conclusiveness’ concerns Wright's diagnosis of one of Casalegno's arguments as depending on an over-estimation of the proper explanatory task of a semantic theory. The present note argues that there is no such dependence.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Boghossian and Casalegno on Understanding and Inference.Timothy Williamson - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):237-247.
    In response to Paul Boghossian's objections in ‘Inferentialism and the epistemology of logic’, this paper defends counterexamples offered by Paolo Casalegno and the author to an inferentialist account of what it is to understand a logical constant, on which Boghossian had relied in his explanation of our entitlement to reason according to basic logical principles. The importance for understanding is stressed of non-inferential aspects of the use of logical constants. Boghossian's criteria for individuating concepts are also queried.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Anti-Realist Truth and Truth-Recognition.Gabriele Usberti - 2012 - Topoi 31 (1):37-45.
    I will be concerned with the following question: are there compelling arguments for postulating a distinction between the truth of a statement and the recognition of its truth, when truth is conceived along the lines of a suitable generalization of the intuitionistic idea that it should be characterized as the existence of a proof? I will argue that the distinction is not necessary within the conceptual framework of intuitionism by replying to two arguments to the contrary, one based on the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Paolo Casalegno's Good Points.Elisa Paganini - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):215-219.
    Most philosophers who had the opportunity to meet Paolo Casalegno (1952-2009) have been impressed by his sharp acumen, his passion for discussing philosophy and his human and intellectual generosity. I had the chance more than others to appreciate his qualities and benefit from them: we worked in the same university in Milan for many years and we had many occasions to discuss philosophy and other non-philosophical topics. I owe a debt of gratitude to him and, together with Paolo’s friends and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reasons to believe and assertion.Paolo Casalegno - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (3):231-248.
  • Reasons to Believe and Assertion.Paolo Casalegno - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (3):231-248.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Boghossian and Casalegno on understanding and inference.Timothy Williamson - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):237-247.
  • Necessity of Thought.Cesare Cozzo - 2015 - In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Springer. pp. 101-20.
    The concept of “necessity of thought” plays a central role in Dag Prawitz’s essay “Logical Consequence from a Constructivist Point of View” (Prawitz 2005). The theme is later developed in various articles devoted to the notion of valid inference (Prawitz, 2009, forthcoming a, forthcoming b). In section 1 I explain how the notion of necessity of thought emerges from Prawitz’s analysis of logical consequence. I try to expound Prawitz’s views concerning the necessity of thought in sections 2, 3 and 4. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Good Points - Paolo Casalegno's criticism of some analytic philosophers.Diana Mazzarella & Carlo Monti - 2011 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior 2 (1):124-134.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark