Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Transplant Ethics: Let’s Begin the Conversation Anew: A Critical Look at One Institute’s Experience with Transplant Related Ethical Issues.David Shafran, Martin L. Smith, Barbara J. Daly & David Goldfarb - 2016 - HEC Forum 28 (2):141-152.
    Standardizing consultation processes is increasingly important as clinical ethics consultation becomes more utilized in and vital to medical practice. Solid organ transplant represents a relatively nascent field replete with complex ethical issues that, while explored, have not been systematically classified. In this paper, we offer a proposed taxonomy that divides issues of resource allocation from viable solutions to the issue of organ shortage in transplant and then further distinguishes between policy and bedside level issues. We then identify all transplant related (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethical reasoning and the embodied, socially situated subject.Suzanne M. Jaeger - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):55-72.
    My discussion is concerned with how symbolic power constitutively structures our very identities in relation to one another and at the bodily level of lived experience. Although many accounts of the self and of subjectivity as socially situated have difficulties in their explanations of agency, Zaners work suggests a basis upon which the selfs independence from others can be understood. His phenomenology of embodied subjectivity explains how the emerging self presupposes presence with others. At the same time, however, co-presence also (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • The Pitfalls of Proceduralism: An Exploration of the Goods Internal to the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation.Annie B. Friedrich - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (4):389-403.
    In an age of professionalization and specialization, the practice of clinical ethics is facing an identity crisis. Are clinical ethicists moral experts, ethics experts, or merely quasi-lawyers giving legal advice? Are they extensions of the hospital, always working to advance the hospital’s interests? Or is there another option? Since 1998, when the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities first issued its Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation, there has been debate about the role of standardization and proceduralism in clinical ethics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Bringing context into ethical discussion: what, when and who?Lucy Frith - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (6):375-376.
    Arguably one of the strengths of the discipline of medical ethics is its close attention to the context in which ethical dilemmas, questions and issues play out. As a discipline that is concerned with helping and supporting practitioners, policy-makers and the public to address the ethical aspects of healthcare provision and practice in the best way they can, context is crucially important. As McMillian puts it, ‘ethics should be grounded’ in the practical realities of the situation.1 What, where and who (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • What kind of doing is clinical ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
    This paper discusses the importance of Richard M. Zaners work on clinical ethics for answering the question: what kind of doing is ethics consultation? The paper argues first, that four common approaches to clinical ethics – applied ethics, casuistry, principlism, and conflict resolution – cannot adequately address the nature of the activity that makes up clinical ethics; second, that understanding the practical character of clinical ethics is critically important for the field; and third, that the practice of clinical ethics is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations