Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dueling Definitions of Abortifacient: How Cultural, Political, and Religious Values Affect Language in the Contraception Debate.Claire Horner & Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (4):14-19.
    Contraception works by preventing fertilization of an egg or preventing implantation of a fertilized embryo. For those who believe pregnancy begins at implantation, contraceptives preventing implantation are not abortifacient. However, for those who assert that pregnancy begins at fertilization, any agent causing the intentional loss of an embryo, even prior to implantation, is abortifacient, both morally and for lack of a different term to describe the postfertilization, preimplantation loss. In the debate on this topic, much of the discourse on both (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Ethics of Postponed Fatherhood.Kristien Hens - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):103-118.
    In this paper, I review some of the discussions on procreative beneficence and procreative autonomy in the context of postponed motherhood and compare the considerations to the context of advanced paternal age. In doing so, I will give an overview of the main scientific findings with regard to how older age in men affects the health of future offspring. I shall demonstrate how the discrepancy between the media coverage and policies on postponed motherhood and postponed fatherhood mistakenly suggests that women (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Male Fertility-Related mHealth: Does It Create New Vulnerabilities?Michiel De Proost - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):199-208.
    Male fertility–related mHealth (MFmHealth), including smartphone applications that allow men to test their fertility at home, is getting some attention now and then. In this commentary, I argue that MFmHealth technology has the potential to undermine established norms around male reproduction but cannot be examined using traditional individualist frameworks in bioethics. Instead, theoretical literature on the concept of vulnerability in feminist bioethics allow a theoretical alliance with critical studies of men and masculinities. Proposed benefits like empowerment, shared responsibility, and democratization (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Freezing fertility or freezing false hope? A content analysis of social egg freezing in U.S. print media.Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Rohia Aziz, Shilpa Darivemula, Jennifer Raffaele, Rajani Bhatia & Wendy M. Parker - 2018 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):181-193.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations