Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. William McElroy, the McCollum–Pratt Institute, and the Transformation of Biology at Johns Hopkins, 1945–1960.Tulley Long - 2009 - Journal of the History of Biology 42 (4):765-809.
    In 1948, a dynamic junior member of the Johns Hopkins Biology Department, William McElroy, became the first director of the McCollum—Pratt Institute for the Investigation of Micronutrient Elements. The Institute was founded at the university to further studies into the practicalities of animal nutrition. Ultimately, however, the Institute reflected McElroy's vision that all biological problems, including nutrition, could be best investigated through basic biochemical and enzymes studies. The Institute quickly became a hub of biochemical research over the following decade, producing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • William McElroy, the McCollum–Pratt Institute, and the Transformation of Biology at Johns Hopkins, 1945–1960.Tulley Long - 2009 - Journal of the History of Biology 42 (4):765 - 809.
    In 1948, a dynamic junior member of the Johns Hopkins Biology Department, William McElroy, became the first director of the McCollum—Pratt Institute for the Investigation of Micronutrient Elements. The Institute was founded at the university to further studies into the practicalities of animal nutrition. Ultimately, however, the Institute reflected McElroy's vision that all biological problems, including nutrition, could be best investigated through basic biochemical and enzymes studies. The Institute quickly became a hub of biochemical research over the following decade, producing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The molecular vista: current perspectives on molecules and life in the twentieth century.Mathias Grote, Lisa Onaga, Angela N. H. Creager, Soraya de Chadarevian, Daniel Liu, Gina Surita & Sarah E. Tracy - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (1):1-18.
    This essay considers how scholarly approaches to the development of molecular biology have too often narrowed the historical aperture to genes, overlooking the ways in which other objects and processes contributed to the molecularization of life. From structural and dynamic studies of biomolecules to cellular membranes and organelles to metabolism and nutrition, new work by historians, philosophers, and STS scholars of the life sciences has revitalized older issues, such as the relationship of life to matter, or of physicochemical inquiries to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations