Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An Enhanced Approach to Distinguishing Public Health Practice and Human Subjects Research.James G. Hodge - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):125-141.
    What are the Differences between Public Health Practice and Research? This perplexing question constantly arises in the planning and performance of public health activities involving the acquisition and use of identifiable health information. Public health agencies collect and analyze significant identifiable health data from health care providers, insurers, other agencies, or individuals to perform an array of public health activities. These activities include surveillance, epidemiological investigations, and evaluation and monitoring. Few debate that these essential public health activities, often specifically authorized (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An Enhanced Approach to Distinguishing Public Health Practice and Human Subjects Research.James G. Hodge - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):125-141.
    What are the Differences between Public Health Practice and Research? This perplexing question constantly arises in the planning and performance of public health activities involving the acquisition and use of identifiable health information. Public health agencies collect and analyze significant identifiable health data from health care providers, insurers, other agencies, or individuals to perform an array of public health activities. These activities include surveillance, epidemiological investigations, and evaluation and monitoring. Few debate that these essential public health activities, often specifically authorized (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Applying the Common Rule to Public Health Agencies: Questions and Tentative Answers About a Separate Regulatory Regime.Scott Burris, James Buehler & Zita Lazzarini - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):638-653.
    No one questions the importance of protecting human subjects of research, but over the past few years dissatisfaction has surfaced with the manner in which the protection is conferred by the federal regulatory system referred to as “The Common Rule. ” Some of the criticism surfaces in print. Some bubbles out anecdotally in conversations among researchers, with complaints about the review process being virtually inevitable whenever the topic arises. Like those in other disciplines that differ more or less dramatically from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Applying the Common Rule to Public Health Agencies: Questions and Tentative Answers about a Separate Regulatory Regime.Scott Burris, James Buehler & Zita Lazzarini - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):638-653.
    No one questions the importance of protecting human subjects of research, but over the past few years dissatisfaction has surfaced with the manner in which the protection is conferred by the federal regulatory system referred to as “The Common Rule. ” Some of the criticism surfaces in print. Some bubbles out anecdotally in conversations among researchers, with complaints about the review process being virtually inevitable whenever the topic arises. Like those in other disciplines that differ more or less dramatically from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations