Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. From Jus ad Bellum to Jus ad Vim: Recalibrating Our Understanding of the Moral Use of Force.Daniel Brunstetter & Megan Braun - 2013 - Ethics and International Affairs 27 (1):87-106.
    In the preface of the 2006 edition ofJust and Unjust Wars, Michael Walzer makes an important distinction between, on the one hand, “measures short of war,” such as imposing no-fly zones, pinpoint air/missile strikes, and CIA operations, and on the other, “actual warfare,” typified by a ground invasion or a large-scale bombing campaign. Even if the former are, technically speaking, acts of war according to international law, he proffers that “it is common sense to recognize that they are very different (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Teaching Business Ethics Through Popular Feature Films: An Experiential Approach.Edward J. O’Boyle & Luca Sandonà - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):329-340.
    Based on our experience in teaching ethics, we have developed, tested, and presented in this article a program of instruction that rests on four pillars: popular feature films, a six-stage ethical decision-making process, the principles necessary to address ethical situations, and the classroom instructor. Taken separately, there is nothing new or unique in these pillars. Taken together, however, and to our knowledge, these four pillars, including the requirement that each student is expected to prepare a written abstract of the film (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Can Just Wars Be Fought Proportionately? A Critique of In Bello Proportionality.Michael C. Hawley - 2023 - Journal of Military Ethics 22 (2):89-102.
    Proportionality has long been considered a pillar of just war theory, requiring that the goods achieved in an action outweigh the collateral harms it causes. In this article, I argue that the in bello principle of proportionality cannot serve its intended function of limiting the destructiveness of actions during war. I illustrate the features of war that make the in bello proportionality constraint not merely impossible to follow, but perhaps even self-defeating. I conclude by suggesting ways in which theorists and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rethinking the Criterion for Assessing Cia-targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality and Jus Ad Vim.Megan Braun & Daniel R. Brunstetter - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (4):304-324.