Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Case for Emissions Egalitarianism.Olle Torpman - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):749-762.
    There is a fixed limit on the greenhouse gas emissions that the atmosphere can absorb before triggering dangerous climate changes. One of the debates in climate ethics concerns how the available emissions should be divided between people. One popular answer, sometimes called “Emissions Egalitarianism”, proposes a distribution of emissions permits that gives everyone an equal per capita share of the atmospheric absorptive capacity. However, several debaters have objected to EE. First, it has been argued that there is no principled reason (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Two Problems of Climate Ethics: Can We Lose the Planet but Save Ourselves?Alexander Lee & Jordan Kincaid - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (2):141-144.