Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Citizenship for Children: By Soil, by Blood, or by Paternalism?Luara Ferracioli - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2859-2877.
    Do states have a right to exclude prospective immigrants as they see fit? According to statists the answer is a qualified yes. For these authors, self-determining political communities have a prima facie right to exclude, which can be overridden by the claims of vulnerable groups such as refugees and children born in the state’s territory. However, there is a concern in the literature that statists have not yet developed a theory that can protect children born in the territory from being (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • State Borders as Defining Lines of Justice: Why the Right to Exclude Cannot Be Justified.Julie Arrildt - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (4):500-520.
  • Territorial Exclusion: An Argument Against Closed Borders.Daniel Weltman - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19 (3):257-90.
    Supporters of open borders sometimes argue that the state has no pro tanto right to restrict immigration, because such a right would also entail a right to exclude existing citizens for whatever reasons justify excluding immigrants. These arguments can be defeated by suggesting that people have a right to stay put. I present a new form of the exclusion argument against closed borders which escapes this “right to stay put” reply. I do this by describing a kind of exclusion that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Migrants by Plane and Migrants by Stork: Can We Refuse Citizenship to One, but Not the Other?Tim Meijers - 2022 - Ethics and Global Politics 15 (3):69-90.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Emigration in a Time of Cholera : Freedom, Brain Drain, and Human Rights.Kieran Oberman - 2016 - Law, Ethics and Philosophy 4:87-108.
    A number of philosophers argue that the earth’s resources belong to every- one equally. Suppose this is true. Does this entail that people have a right to migrate across borders? This article considers two models of egalitarian ownership and assesses their implications for immigration policy. The first is Equal Division, under which each person is granted an equal share of the value of the earth’s natural resources. The second is Common Ownership, under which every person has the right to use (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations