Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The evolution and evolvability of culture.Kim Sterelny - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):137-165.
    Joseph Henrich and Richard McElreath begin their survey of theories of cultural evolution with a striking historical example. They contrast the fate of the Bourke and Wills expedition — an attempt to explore some of the arid areas of inland Australia — with the routine survival of the local aboriginals in exactly the same area. That expedition ended in failure and death, despite the fact that it was well equipped, and despite the fact that those on the expedition were tough (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • The Evolution and Evolvability of Culture.Kim Sterelny - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):137-165.
    In this paper I argue, first, that human lifeways depend on cognitive capital that has typically been built over many generations. This process of gradual accumulation produces an adaptive fit between human agents and their environments; an adaptive fit that is the result of hidden‐hand, evolutionary mechanisms. To explain distinctive features of human life, we need to understand how cultures evolve. Second, I distinguish a range of different evolutionary models of culture. Third, I argue that none of meme‐based models, dual (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Trois sortes d'altruisme et leur rapport à la morale.Christine Clavien - 2011 - In Masala & Ravat (ed.), La Morale Humaine Et les Sciences. Editions Matériologiques. pp. 141--68.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Influences on communication about reproduction: the cultural evolution of low fertility.Peter J. Richersonb - unknown
    The cultural norms of traditional societies encourage behavior that is consistent with maximizing reproductive success but those of modern post-demographic transition societies do not. Newson et al (2005) proposed that this might be because interaction between kin is relatively less frequent in modern social networks. Assuming that people’s evaluations of reproductive decisions are influenced by a desire to increase their inclusive fitness, they will be inclined to prefer their kin to make fitness-enhancing choices. Such a preference will encourage the emergence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations