Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Normative Error Theory and No Self-Defeat: A Reply to Case.Mustafa Khuramy & Erik Schulz - forthcoming - Philosophia 51 (5):1-6.
    Many philosophers have claimed that normative error theorists are committed to the claim ‘Error theory is true, but I have no reason to believe it’, which to some appears paradoxical. Case (2019) has claimed that the normative error theorist cannot avoid this paradox. In this paper, we argue that there is no paradox in the first place, that is once we clear up the ambiguity of the word ‘reason’, both on the error theorist’s side and those that claim that there (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • No perils of rejecting the parity argument.Mustafa Khuramy & Erik Schulz - forthcoming - Studia Humana.
    Many moral realists have employed a strategy for arguing for moral realism by claiming that if epistemic normativity is categorical and that if this epistemic normativity exists, then categorical normativity exists. In this paper, we will discuss that argument, examine a way out, and respond to the objections people have recently raised in the literature. In the end, we conclude that the objections to our way out will do little in the way of motivating those who already do not believe (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•