Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Crisis Management and Ethics: Moving Beyond the Public-Relations-Person-as-Corporate-Conscience Construct.Burton St John Iii & Yvette E. Pearson - 2016 - Journal of Media Ethics 31 (1):18-34.
    Over the past 40 years, scholars and practitioners of public relations have often cast public relations workers in the role of the public relations-person-as-corporate-conscience. This work, however, maintains that this construct is so problematic that invoking it is of negligible use in addressing ethical issues that emerge during a crisis. In fact, a complex crisis, such as the Jahi McMath “brain death” case at Children’s Hospital Oakland, demonstrates the need to abandon the PRPaCC construct to better engage affected stakeholders, including (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Paradox of the Dead Donor Rule: Increasing Death on the Waiting List.Robert M. Sade & Andrea Boan - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):21-23.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Brain Dead Patients Are Still Whole Organisms.Nicholas Sadovnikoff & Daniel Wikler - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):39-40.
  • Should We Scrap the Dead Donor Rule?John Robertson - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):52-53.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Physicians’ Perspectives on Ethically Challenging Situations: Early Identification and Action.Carol Pavlish, Katherine Brown-Saltzman, Kevin M. Dirksen & Alyssa Fine - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (3):28-40.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Brain Death as the End of a Human Organism as a Self-moving Whole.Adam Omelianchuk - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (5):530-560.
    The biophilosophic justification for the idea that “brain death” is death needs to support two claims: that what dies in human death is a human organism, not merely a psychological entity distinct from it; that total brain failure signifies the end of the human organism as a whole. Defenders of brain death typically assume without argument that the first claim is true and argue for the second by defending the “integrative unity” rationale. Yet the integrative unity rationale has fallen on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Clinical and ethical perspectives on brain death.Michael Nair-Collins - 2015 - Medicolegal and Bioethics 5:69-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Christian Bioethics, Brain Death, and Vital Organ Donation.Michael G. Muñoz - 2018 - Christian Bioethics 24 (1):79-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Functionalist View of Brain Death.Samuel LiPuma & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):19-20.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Organism as a Whole in an Analysis of Death.Andrew P. Huang & James L. Bernat - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (6):712-731.
    Although death statutes permitting physicians to declare brain death are relatively uniform throughout the United States, academic debate persists over the equivalency of human death and brain death. Alan Shewmon showed that the formerly accepted integration rationale was conceptually incomplete by showing that brain-dead patients demonstrated a degree of integration. We provide a more complete rationale for the equivalency of human death and brain death by defending a deeper understanding of the organism as a whole and by using a novel (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Constructing the Legal Concept of Death: The Counterhegemonic Option.Miran Epstein - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):45-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Irreversible Shmirreversible.Russell DiSilvestro - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):26-28.
  • Beyond Transplantation: Considering Brain Death as a Hard Clinical Endpoint.Michelle J. Clarke, Megan S. Remtema & Keith M. Swetz - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):43-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Conceptual Justification for Brain Death.James L. Bernat - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):19-21.
    Among the old and new controversies over brain death, none is more fundamental than whether brain death is equivalent to the biological phenomenon of human death. Here, I defend this equivalency by offering a brief conceptual justification for this view of brain death, a subject that Andrew Huang and I recently analyzed elsewhere in greater detail. My defense of the concept of brain death has evolved since Bernard Gert, Charles Culver, and I first addressed it in 1981, a development that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Status of Baby Born to Brain-dead Mother: Ethical and Logical Issues.Ewa Baum, Dariusz Iżycki, Katarzyna Beata Głodowska, Agnieszka Żok & Aleksandra Bendowska - 2019 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 60 (1):49-59.
    The study aims to analyse the clinical proceedings in pregnant women diagnosed with brain death. Apart from the diagnostic premises and the patient’s rights, the ontological status of the foetus proves to be a severe problem. In reference to the principles of zeroth-order logic, the assumption of potential used by personalists is not a tautology.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Brain Dead Patient Is Still Sentient: A Further Reply to Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3):315-328.
    Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez have argued that the total brain dead patient is still dead because the integrated entity that remains is not even an animal, not only because he is not sentient but also, and more importantly, because he has lost the radical capacity for sentience. In this essay, written from within and as a contribution to the Catholic philosophical tradition, I respond to Lee and Grisez’s argument by proposing that the brain dead patient is still sentient because (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations