Switch to: References

Citations of:

Moral Progress: A Process Critique of Macintyre

State University of New York Press (2000)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Books Received (2000). [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (4):421-424.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Whitehead, confucius, and the aesthetics of virtue.Nicholas F. Gier - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (2):171 – 190.
    The most constructive response to the crisis in moral theory has been the revival of virtue ethics, an ethics that has the advantages of being personal, contextual, and, as this paper will argue, normative as well. The first section offers a general comparative analysis of Confucian and Whiteheadian philosophies, showing their common process orientation and their views of a somatic self united in reason and passion. The second section contrasts rational with aesthetic order, demonstrating a parallel with analytic and synthetic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Critique of MacIntyrean Morality from a Kantian Perspective.Krishna Mani Pathak - 2014 - SAGE Open 4 (2):1-10.
    This article is a critical examination of MacIntyre’s notion of morality in reference to Kant’s deontological moral theory. The examination shows that MacIntyre (a) criticizes Kant’s moral theory to defend virtue ethics or neo-Aristotelian ethics with a weak notion of morality; (b) favors the idea of local morality, which does not leave any room for moral assessment and reciprocity in an intercultural domain; and (c) fails to provide good arguments for his moral historicism and against Kant’s moral universalism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation