Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How is it that infinitary methods can be applied to finitary mathematics? Gödel's T: a case study.Andreas Weiermann - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1348-1370.
    Inspired by Pohlers' local predicativity approach to Pure Proof Theory and Howard's ordinal analysis of bar recursion of type zero we present a short, technically smooth and constructive strong normalization proof for Gödel's system T of primitive recursive functionals of finite types by constructing an ε 0 -recursive function [] 0 : T → ω so that a reduces to b implies [a] $_0 > [b]_0$ . The construction of [] 0 is based on a careful analysis of the Howard-Schütte (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • 2004 Summer Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic.Wolfram Pohlers - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):249-312.
  • A lexicographic path order with slow growing derivation bounds.Naohi Eguchi - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (2):212-224.
    This paper is concerned with implicit computational complexity of the exptime computable functions. Modifying the lexicographic path order, we introduce a path order EPO. It is shown that a termination proof for a term rewriting system via EPO implies an exponential bound on the lengths of derivations. The path order EPO is designed so that every exptime function is representable as a term rewrite system compatible with EPO (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Proving consistency of equational theories in bounded arithmetic.Arnold Beckmann† - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):279-296.
    We consider equational theories for functions defined via recursion involving equations between closed terms with natural rules based on recursive definitions of the function symbols. We show that consistency of such equational theories can be proved in the weak fragment of arithmetic S 1 2 . In particular this solves an open problem formulated by TAKEUTI (c.f. [5, p.5 problem 9.]).
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation