Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. EvoDevo Concepts in the Work of Waddington.Brian K. Hall - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (3):198-203.
    Conrad Hal Waddington integrated genetics with embryology and evolution by formulating and providing experimental evidence for the mechanisms of canalization and genetic assimilation in the context of stabilizing selection, and by fostering an epigenetic rather than the prevailing gene-centered view of embryonic development and of evolutionary change in development and adult form. Waddington saw phenotypes as processes, not static structures and behaviors. Trained in geology at Cambridge, Waddington turned to experimental studies on the chemical nature of the primary organizer and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Waddington’s epigenetics or the pictorial meetings of development and genetics.Antonine Nicoglou - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (4):61.
    In 1956, in his Principles of Embryology, Conrad Hal Waddington explained that the word “epigenetics” should be used to translate and update Wilhelm Roux’ German notion of “Entwicklungsmechanik” to qualify the studies focusing on the mechanisms of development. When Waddington mentioned it in 1956, the notion of epigenetics was not yet popular, as it would become from the 1980s. However, Waddington referred first to the notion in the late 1930s. While his late allusion clearly reveals that Waddington readily associated the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Rediscovering Waddington in the post‐genomic age.Heather A. Jamniczky, Julia C. Boughner, Campbell Rolian, Paula N. Gonzalez, Christopher D. Powell, Eric J. Schmidt, Trish E. Parsons, Fred L. Bookstein & Benedikt Hallgrímsson - 2010 - Bioessays 32 (7):553-558.
  • C.H. Waddington’s differences with the creators of the modern evolutionary synthesis: a tale of two genes.Jonathan B. L. Bard - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (3):18.
    In 2011, Peterson suggested that the main reason why C.H. Waddington was essentially ignored by the framers of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1950s was because they were Cartesian reductionists and mathematical population geneticists while he was a Whiteheadian organicist and experimental geneticist who worked with Drosophila. This paper suggests a further reason that can only be seen now. The former defined genes and their alleles by their selectable phenotypes, essentially the Mendelian view, while Waddington defined a gene through (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A systems biology view of evolutionary genetics.Jonathan Bard - 2010 - Bioessays 32 (7):559-563.