Switch to: References

Citations of:

An Appraisal of Bertrand Russell's Philosophy'

In David Pears (ed.), Bertrand Russell. Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books. pp. 6-12 (1972)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Monk on Russell’s Heart of Darkness.Richard McDonough - 2015 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 35 (1):29-42.
    The paper argues that Russell’s fascination with Conrad’s Heart of Darkness reveals a positive aspect of Russell’s character neglected by Monk’s biography. Section 1 sketches some of the darker aspects of Russell’s character. §2 outlines the relevant themes in Heart of Darkness. §3 argues that Russell’s fascination both with Conrad and his novel derives from his resolute commitment to a painful exercise in self-knowledge. §4 explains the more positive perspective on Russell’s “strength of mind” that emerges from this argument.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Russell's Contribution to Philosophy of Education.William Hare - 1987 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 7 (1):25.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • James and Russell on neutral monism.Saeedah Ahmad - unknown
    This thesis evaluates and compares two versions of neutral monism, one developed by William James and the other by Bertrand Russell. Both argued against Cartesianism in favour of a "subjectless given" as the basic stuff which constitutes both mind and matter. My evaluation will demonstrate that James’s and Russell's supposedly neutral entities are not neutral as their exponents claim because they fail to satisfy important criteria set for a theory to be genuinely neutral. There are two fundamental elements within my (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Existence, appearance, and acquaintance.Augustin RIŠKA - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (1):5-15.
    When A. J. Ayer commented on Russell’s theory of acquaintance, he claimed that the person who is acquainted with an object knows that the object exists and also that the object in question has the properties which it appears to have. This essay employs Russell’s theory of knowledge by acquaintance from the period between 1910 and 1918 and critically analyzes both the existential and the descriptive statements as they are related to the object of acquaintance. In particular, Ayer’s views on (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•