Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The De Intellectu Revisited.Frederic Schroeder & Robert Todd - 2008 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64 (3):663-680.
    L’auteur du De Intellectu connaît le De Anima d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise et il offre une interprétation néoplatonicienne de ce texte dans sa considération de la doctrine noétique d’Aristote du De Anima 3.5. Cette interprétation révèle précisément cette autonomie philosophique par opposition à un examen purement philologique des textes aristotéliciens que le présent volume explore. Le De Intellectu, en raison de son caractère néoplatonicien, doit dater de quelque deux à quatre siècles après Alexandre. Il ne contient aucune référence à un Aristote de (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Intellectu 110.4: 'I Heard this from Aristotle'. A modest proposal.Jan Opsomer & Bob Sharples - 2000 - Classical Quarterly 50 (01):252-.
    The treatise De intellectu attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias can be divided into four sections. The first is an interpretation of the Aristotelian theory of intellect, and especially of the active intellect referred to in Aristotle, De anima 3.5, which differs from the interpretation in Alexander's own De anima, and whose relation to Alexander's De anima, attribution to Alexander, and date are all disputed. The second is an account of the intellect which is broadly similar to A though differing on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Intellectu 110.4: ‘I Heard this from Aristotle’. A modest proposal.Jan Opsomer & Bob Sharples - 2000 - Classical Quarterly 50 (1):252-256.
    The treatise De intellectu attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias can be divided into four sections. The first is an interpretation of the Aristotelian theory of intellect, and especially of the active intellect referred to in Aristotle, De anima 3.5, which differs from the interpretation in Alexander's own De anima, and whose relation to Alexander's De anima, attribution to Alexander, and date are all disputed. The second is an account of the intellect which is broadly similar to A though differing on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Syrianus.Christian Wildberg - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations