Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reconsidering the Rule of Consideration: Probabilistic Knowledge and Legal Proof.Tim Smartt - 2022 - Episteme 19 (2):303-318.
    In this paper, I provide an argument for rejecting Sarah Moss's recent account of legal proof. Moss's account is attractive in a number of ways. It provides a new version of a knowledge-based theory of legal proof that elegantly resolves a number of puzzles about mere statistical evidence in the law. Moreover, the account promises to have attractive implications for social and moral philosophy, in particular about the impermissibility of racial profiling and other harmful kinds of statistical generalisation. In this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Policy of Evidence.Giovanni Tuzet - 2021 - Theoria 87 (6):1418-1443.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Was lehrt uns das Gettier-Problem über das Verhältnis zwischen Intuitionen und Begriffsanalysen?Geert Keil - 2013 - In Gerhard Ernst & Lisa Marani (eds.), Das Gettierproblem. Eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren. Mentis. pp. 107-144.
    Der Beitrag beleuchtet einen bisher kaum gewürdigten Grund dafür, dass die Gettier-Debatte nicht zu einer systematisch verbesserten Analyse des Wissensbegriffs geführt hat. Es wird die These entwickelt und verteidigt, dass diejenigen Komplikationen, die einen Gettierfall zu einem solchen machen, sich stets in den blinden Flecken der Situationsrepräsentation des epistemischen Subjekts befinden. Diese These ist in die metaphilosophische Fragestellung eingebettet, was das Gettierproblem uns über das Verhältnis von sprachlichen Intuitionen und Begriffsanalysen lehrt. Es gibt unter kompetenten Sprechern beträchtliche Einmütigkeit darüber, dass (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Epistemología de Virtudes Robusta: Sobre Los Límites y Las Posibilidades de Su Aplicación a la Prueba de Los Hechos En El Derecho.Pedro H. Haddad Bernat - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (145):3-24.
    The purpose of this paper is to define the general features of a suitable epistemology for law. In particular, the paper is concerned with a very influential project that is nowadays offered in the literature: robust virtue epistemology. As I will show here, such a project is untenable for law, since a satisfactory and complete epistemology of legal proof requires the conjunction of both the agent’s perspective and the inquiry system’s perspective. Keywords: legal epistemology, judicial reasoning, legal fact-finding, epistemic virtues, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • More on the Gettier Problem and Legal Proof.Michael S. Pardo - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (1):75-80.
  • Safety Vs. Sensitivity: Possible Worlds and the Law of Evidence.Michael S. Pardo - 2018 - Legal Theory 24 (1):50-75.
    ABSTRACTThis article defends the importance of epistemic safety for legal evidence. Drawing on discussions of sensitivity and safety in epistemology, the article explores how similar considerations apply to legal proof. In the legal context, sensitivity concerns whether a factual finding would be made if it were false, and safety concerns how easily a factual finding could be false. The article critiques recent claims about the importance of sensitivity for the law of evidence. In particular, this critique argues that sensitivity does (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Reply to Pardo: Unsafe Legal Knowledge?Mark McBride - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (1):67-73.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Coherence, Evidence, and Legal Proof.Amalia Amaya - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (1):1-43.
    The aim of this essay is to develop a coherence theory for the justification of evidentiary judgments in law. The main claim of the coherence theory proposed in this article is that a belief about the events being litigated is justified if and only if it is a belief that an epistemically responsible fact finder might hold by virtue of its coherence in like circumstances. The article argues that this coherentist approach to evidence and legal proof has the resources to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations