This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

355 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 355
Material to categorize
  1. Queere und schwule Theorie (Foucault Rezeption).Karsten Schubert - 2020 - In Clemens Kammler, Rolf Parr & Ulrich Johannes Schneider (eds.), Foucault-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart, Deutschland: pp. 503-509.
    Foucault bildet eine zentrale Grundlage der queeren und schwulen Theorie, die sich seit den späten 1980er Jahren insbesondere in den USA entwickelt hat. Seine Macht- und Subjekttheorie ist die Basis für eine nicht- essentialistische Analyse von Sexualität und für die Kritik ihrer normierenden Wirkung, die Foucault selbst in Der Wille zum Wissen (1983, frz. 1976) begonnen hat und die das Kerngeschäft der Queertheorie ist. Während Foucault als Grundlage der Queertheorie insgesamt rezipiert wird, gibt es eine spezifisch schwule Rezeption von Foucault, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Queer Oppression and Pacifism.Blake Hereth - 2018 - In Andrew Fiala (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Pacifism and Nonviolence. New York, NY, USA: pp. 281-292.
    This chapter argues that considerations arising from queer oppression can furnish support for pacifist positions. The first consideration concerns the nature and strength of the moral presumption against violence. Violence undermines a victim’s agency, coercing them to betray their identities, not unlike “reparative therapy.” The second consideration concerns the moral presumption against conscription. Current conscription policies are cisgender-normative, threaten to coerce queer citizens to fight for unjust states that oppose their basic rights, and coerce queer citizens to risk their lives (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Langer Weg zur sexuellen Selbstbestimmung. Der Schutz von LSBTI durch die Vereinten Nationen.Karsten Schubert - 2013 - Vereinte Nationen 61 (5):216-222.
    Menschenrechtsverletzungen aufgrund sexueller Orientierung und Geschlechtsidentität (SOGI) wurden auf internationaler Ebene lange Zeit kaum zur Kenntnis genommen. Doch seit einigen Jahren wird dem Thema in den Vereinten Nationen breiterer Raum eingeräumt. Die Yogyakarta-Prinzipien und eine Studie des Amtes des Hohen Kommissars für Menschenrechte stellen nur die ersten Schritte auf dem Weg zu einem umfassenderen Schutzansatz dar. Er muss gegen den Widerstand vieler Staaten weiterverfolgt werden.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Staatliche Macht und Heteronormativität. [REVIEW]Karsten Schubert - 2011 - HugsandKisses 8.
    Was hat der Staat mit sexueller Orientierung zu tun? Eine ganze Menge, meint Gundula Ludwig, denn durch staatliche Macht in Form von „heteronormativer Hegemonie“ würden wir zu Subjekten gemacht – und zwar ‚normalerweise‘ zu männlichen bzw. weiblichen und heterosexuellen. Dabei betont Ludwig die Gegenseitigkeit des Verhältnisses von Staat und Geschlecht: Nicht nur wirke staatliche Macht konstitutiv und vergeschlechtlichend auf Subjekte, sondern der Staat selbst werde im „Prozess der vergeschlechtlichen Subjektkonstitution erst hervorgebracht“. Deshalb seien weder der Staat noch Heterosexualität natürlich gegeben, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Do You Have To Be A Lesbian To Be A Feminist?Marilyn Frye - manuscript
    "Do You Have To Be A Lesbian To Be A Feminist?" Plenary session speech at the conference of the National Women's Studies Association, June 1990.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Homophobia.Marilyn Frye - 2000 - In Lorraine Code (ed.), Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 254-255.
  7. Do You Have to Be a Lesbian to Be a Feminist?Marilyn Frye - 1990 - Off Our Backs 20 (8):21-23.
  8. From Gay Liberation to Marriage Equality: A Political Lesson to Be Learnt.Mariano Croce - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 17 (3):280-299.
    This article deals with the issue of resignification to advance a hypothesis on the way in which social practices are transformed with recourse to the language of institutions. It first discusses the transition from gay liberation to same-sex marriage equality by exploring the trajectory of homosexuals’ rights claims. The article continues by providing a theoretical interpretation of what brought this shift about, that is, what the author calls a movement ‘from the street to the court’: in both civil law and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9. Philosophical Foundations of Children's and Family Law.Elizabeth Brake & Lucinda Ferguson (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
    What defines family law? Is it an area of law with clean boundaries and unified distinguishing characteristics, or an untidy grouping of disparate rules and doctrines? What values or principles should guide it – and how could it be improved? Indeed, even the scope of family law is contested. Whilst some law schools and textbooks separate family law from children’s law, this is invariably effected without asking what might be gained or lost from treating them together or separately. Should family (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Lesbians Reviewing/Reviewing Lesbians.Julia Penelope - 1988 - Feminist Studies 14 (3):606.
  11. Stereotypical Inferences: Philosophical Relevance and Psycholinguistic Toolkit.Eugen Fischer & Paul E. Engelhardt - 2017 - Ratio 30 (4):411-442.
    Stereotypes shape inferences in philosophical thought, political discourse, and everyday life. These inferences are routinely made when thinkers engage in language comprehension or production: We make them whenever we hear, read, or formulate stories, reports, philosophical case-descriptions, or premises of arguments – on virtually any topic. These inferences are largely automatic: largely unconscious, non-intentional, and effortless. Accordingly, they shape our thought in ways we can properly understand only by complementing traditional forms of philosophical analysis with experimental methods from psycholinguistics. This (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  12. Liberté! Egalité! Sexualité!Morris B. Kaplan - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (3):401-433.
  13. The Meaning and Status of Gay and Lesbian Political Philosophy: A Rejoinder to E. Robert Statham, Jr.Mark Blasius - 1995 - Political Theory 23 (3):520-526.
  14. ADAMS, ROMANZO. Interracial Marriage in Hawaii. [REVIEW]Kingsley Davis - 1937 - Journal of Social Philosophy and Jurisprudence 3:373.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Homosexuality and “Compassionate” Conservatism in the Discourse of the Post‐Reaganite Right.Paul Apostolidis - 2001 - Constellations 8 (1):78-105.
  16. Thoughtful Economic Man: Essays on Rationality, Moral Rules and Benevolence.Donald C. Hubin - 1993 - Ethics 103 (3):572-574.
    Some have attempted to justify benefit/ cost analysis by appealing to a moral theory that appears to directly ground the technique. This approach is unsuccessful because the moral theory in question is wildly implausible and, even if it were correct, it would probably not endorse the unrestricted use of benefit/ cost analysis. Nevertheless, there is reason to think that a carefully restricted use of benefit/ cost analysis will be justifiable from a wide variety of plausible moral perspectives. From this, it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Marriage and the Metaphysics of Bodily Union: Framing the Same-Sex Marriage Debate.Rebekah Johnston - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (2):288-312.
    One current line of argument against the legalization of same-sex marriage, advocated primarily by the New Natural Lawyers, is that marriage is a pre-political institution that has, as an essential element, a bodily union requirement. They argue that same-sex couples cannot realize bodily union in their sexual activities and thus cannot meet the structural requirements of marriage. Accordingly, they argue that the same-sex marriage debate must be framed as a debate about what marriage is, and not, as it was in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Free Love: A Hegalian Defense of Same-Sex Marriage Rights.Jim Vernon - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):69-89.
    By revisiting Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, I mount a Hegelian defense of same-sex marriage rights. I first argue that Hegel’s account of theIdea of freedom articulates both the necessity of popular shifts in the determinations of the institutions of right, as well as the duty to struggle to progressively actualize freedom through them. I then contend that Hegel, by grounding marriage in free consent, clears the path for expanding this ethical institution to include all monogamous couples. Lastly, I close by (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. Should We Abolish Legal Marriage?Nicholas C. Lund-Molfese - 2000 - Catholic Social Science Review 5:339-343.
    This article considers the arguments made in Baker v. Vermont, wherein the Vermont Supreme Court held that same-sex couples must be granted all thelegal rights and privileges that are granted to married couples. The article concludes by questioning if abolishing the legal institution of marriage would be the best way to protect the natural institution of marriage.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Kingship and Marriage in a New Guinea Village.Leonard B. Glick & H. Ian Hogbin - 1965 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 85 (2):288.
  21. God and Marriage 1945–50.GeorgeHG Grant - 1996 - In George Grant: Selected Letters. University of Toronto Press. pp. 116-165.
  22. The Liberal Case for Disestablishing Marriage.Tamara Metz - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2):196-217.
    What role should the state have in recognizing and regulating marriage? Until recently, liberal political theorists paid little attention to this question. Yet the challenges that the public–private boundary-crossing institution of marriage poses to liberalism are substantial. Tensions in contemporary debates suggest that these challenges remain unaddressed and thus, invite attempts to formulate a coherent and compelling model of the relationship between marriage and the liberal state. This article responds to this invitation. Marriage has long been a concern of at (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  23. Corrigendum To: A Marriage of Equals? Characterization in the Passio Chrysanthi Et Dariae.Annelies Bossu & Danny Praet - 2016 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 160 (1):184-184.
  24. The Productive Power of Ambiguity: Rethinking Homosexuality Through the Virtual and Developmental Systems Theory.Ann Burlein - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (1):21-53.
  25. Book Review: Richard D. Mohr. The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights. [REVIEW]Patrick D. Hopkins - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (1):243-246.
  26. An Ethos of Lesbian and Gay Existence.Mark Blasius - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (4):642-671.
  27. On the Marriage of Philosophy and Politics.Daniel W. Conway - 1997 - Political Theory 25 (6):855-868.
  28. The Marriage of a Limitation with an Opportunity.Sarah Wood - unknown
  29. Analogizing Interracial and Same-Sex Marriage.Isaac West - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (4):561-582.
    Midway between the unintelligible and the commonplace, it is metaphor which most produces knowledge. In the struggle for the recognition of gay and lesbian marriage equality in the United States, advocates often employ arguments analogizing the prohibitions against same-sex civil marriages as equally invalid as those that forbid legally interracial marriages.1 Whether it be in legal briefs, oral arguments, media appearances, or everyday conversations, more often than not, the legitimacy of gay and lesbian claims to equal protection before the law (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. A Marriage of Equals?Danny Praet & Annelies Bossu - 2015 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 159 (2):301-326.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Philologus Jahrgang: 159 Heft: 2 Seiten: 301-326.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Being Fair to the Fairness Argument for Same-Sex Marriage.Joseph Sartorelli - 2015 - Think 14 (41):73-80.
    According to the fairness argument, same-sex marriage must be permitted because without it there would not be equal treatment for homosexuals and heterosexuals. In, Piers Benn holds that the argument does eventually deliver this conclusion, but not as readily as intuitively appears. He concludes that some conservative points against same-sex marriage achieve at least a stand-off from the point of view of the argument. I argue that he accords the conservative points much more significance than they actually deserve and misconstrues (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. From Marriage to Political Leadership: Lessons in Social Competencies From the Igbo Conception of Marriage.Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani - 2014 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 6 (1):49.
    Owing most probably to Western-style modernization, marriage is increasingly understood to be a business strictly for married couples. However, I argue that this is an error, as many inexperienced couples are left to their own devices, and thereby often fail to utilize marriage to acquire the social competencies that are crucial to wider social responsibilities, including political leadership. The modern atomic conception of marriage is influenced by the Kantinspired Western conception of moral autonomy. Nevertheless, I reject this conception as excessively (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act.Janice Schuetz - 2015 - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Springer Verlag.
  34. Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas: Policy Innovation for Same-Sex Relationships.Jason Pierceson, Adriana Piatti-Crocker & Shawn Schulenberg (eds.) - 2010 - Lexington Books.
    This book explores policy innovation for same-sex couples throughout the Americas and includes same-sex marriage legislation, civil unions, and other new developments for same-sex couples throughout the Americas at both national and sub-national levels. This scholarship is innovative because though much has been written regarding developments in North America, there is very little work dealing with recent developments in the rest of the Americas.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Arbitrariness, Irrationality, and the Sterility Objection: A Reply to Anderson.Patrick A. Tully - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):135-144.
    Does the contemporary Natural Law position that only heterosexual couples are capable of marriage rest upon an “arbitrary and irrational distinction between same-sex couples and sterile heterosexual couples?” Anderson :759–775, 2013: 759). There are many who think so. In a recent article in these pages, Erik Anderson offers his case that these critics are correct. In what follows I examine Anderson’s argument and conclude that, whether or not one ultimately agrees with the New Natural Law account of marriage, the distinction (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights.Richard D. Mohr - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (1):243-246.
  37. One Marriage Two Faiths.James H. S. Bossard & Eleanor Stokes - 1958 - Science and Society 22 (1):87-89.
  38. The Future of Marriage in Western Civilization. By G. C. Field. [REVIEW]Edward Westermarck - 1936 - International Journal of Ethics 47:494.
  39. The History of Human Marriage, by J. S. Mackenzie. [REVIEW]Edward Westermarck - 1921 - International Journal of Ethics 32:446.
  40. Marriage and Morals. By C. D. Burns. [REVIEW]Bertrand Russell - 1929 - International Journal of Ethics 40:435.
  41. The Meaning of Marriage, by Nancy Catty. [REVIEW]G. Spiller - 1914 - International Journal of Ethics 25:419.
  42. The Adornment of the Spiritual Marriage, Etc., Translated by C. A. Wynschenck, Dom, by G. K. S. [REVIEW]Jan Van Ruysbroek - 1917 - International Journal of Ethics 28:135.
  43. Children as the Common Good of Marriage.Michael Waldstein - 2009 - Nova et Vetera 7:697-709.
  44. Sexuality Injustice.Cheshire Calhoun - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 9 (1):241-274.
    Sexuality injustice differs significantly in form from racial and gender injustice. Because persons who are gay or lesbian can evade being publicly identified and treated as gays or lesbians, sexuality injustice does not consist, as racial and gender injustice does, in the disproportionate occupation of disadvantaging and highly exploitable places in the socio-economic structure. Instead, sexuality injustice consists in the displacement of homosexuality and lesbianism to the outside of society. I examine, in particular, (1) the production of society as heterosexual (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45. Homosexual Rights and Citizen Initiatives: Is Constitutionalism Unconstitutional?Richard Duncan & Gary Young - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 9 (1):93-136.
  46. Homosexual Marriage and the Myth of Tolerance: Is Cardinal O'Connor a "Homophone"?Richard Duncan - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 10 (2):587-608.
  47. A Philosophical Analysis of the Fundamental Law of Marriage in American Jurisprudence.John Hiski Ridge - 2004 - Dissertation, Boston College
    This dissertation is about the fundamental right to marry in American jurisprudence. The study is divided into seven chapters. ;Chapter one is an introductory chapter. It introduces some basic terminology, sets out two primary assumptions that govern the dissertation, and provides an overview of the following chapters. Chapter two examines the unique historical development of the fundamental right to marry in the United States. Chapter three discusses a contemporary dilemma that has arisen as a result of this historical development. Within (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Glandular Politics: Experimental Biology, Clinical Medicine, and Homosexual Emancipation in Fin-de-Siecle Central Europe.Chandak Sengoopta - 1998 - Isis 89:445-473.
  49. Elizabeth Brake, "Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law". [REVIEW]Tamara Metz - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (1):153-159.
  50. How a Libertarian Might Oppose Same-Sex Marriage.Mazen Guirguis - 2011 - Reason Papers 33:82-94.
1 — 50 / 355