This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

54 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 54
  1. Problems of Religious Luck, Ch. 4: "We Are All of the Common Herd: Montaigne and the Psychology of Our 'Importunate Presumptions'".Guy Axtell - forthcoming - In Problems of Religious Luck: Assessing the Limits of Reasonable Religious Disagreement.
    As we have seen in the transition form Part I to Part II of this book, the inductive riskiness of doxastic methods applied in testimonial uptake or prescribed as exemplary of religious faith, helpfully operationalizes the broader social scientific, philosophical, moral, and theological interest that people may have with problems of religious luck. Accordingly, we will now speak less about luck, but more about the manner in which highly risky cognitive strategies are correlated with psychological studies of bias studies and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Can Figures Persuade? Zeugma as a Figure of Persuasion in Latin.William Michael Short - forthcoming - Classical Quarterly:1-17.
    Use of rhetorical figures has been an element of persuasive speech at least since Gorgias of Leontini, for whom such deliberate deviations from ordinary literal language were a defining feature of what he called the ‘psychagogic art’. But must we consider figures of speech limited to an ornamental and merely stylistic function, as some ancient and still many modern theorists suggest? Not according to contemporary cognitive rhetoric, which proposes that figures of speech can play a fundamentally argumentative role in speech (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Was Aristotle a Virtue Argumentation Theorist?Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - In Joseph Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 215-229.
    Virtue theories of argumentation (VTA) emphasize the roles arguers play in the conduct and evaluation of arguments, and lay particular stress on arguers’ acquired dispositions of character, that is, virtues and vices. The inspiration for VTA lies in virtue epistemology and virtue ethics, the latter being a modern revival of Aristotle’s ethics. Aristotle is also, of course, the father of Western logic and argumentation. This paper asks to what degree Aristotle may thereby be claimed as a forefather by VTA.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Communicative Functions of Metaphors Between Explanation and Persuasion.Fabrizio Macagno & Maria Grazia Rossi - 2021 - In Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (eds.), Inquiries in philosophical pragmatics. Theoretical developments. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 171-191.
    In the literature, the pragmatic dimension of metaphors has been clearly acknowledged. Metaphors are regarded as having different possible uses, and in particular, they are commonly viewed as instruments for pursuing persuasion. However, an analysis of the specific conversational purposes that they can be aimed at achieving in a dialogue and their adequacy thereto is still missing. In this paper, we will address this issue focusing on the distinction between the explanatory and persuasive goal. The difference between explanation and persuasion (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Hume's Rhetorical Strategy: Three Views.Daryl Ooi - 2021 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (19):243–259.
    In the Fragment on Evil, Hume announces that he “shall not employ any rhetoric in a philosophical argument, where reason alone ought to be hearkened to.” To employ the rhetorical strategy, in the context of the Fragment, just is to “enumerate all the evils, incident to human life, and display them, with eloquence, in their proper colours.” However, in Part 11 of the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume employs precisely this rhetorical strategy. I discuss three interpretations that might account for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Hume's Rhetorical Strategy: Three Views.Daryl Ooi - 2021 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 19 (3):243–259.
    In the Fragment on Evil, Hume announces that he “shall not employ any rhetoric in a philosophical argument, where reason alone ought to be hearkened to.” To employ the rhetorical strategy, in the context of the Fragment, just is to “enumerate all the evils, incident to human life, and display them, with eloquence, in their proper colours.” However, in Part 11 of the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume employs precisely this rhetorical strategy. I discuss three interpretations that might account for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Negative Theology and Meaningless Suffering.Karen Kilby - 2020 - Modern Theology 36 (1):92-104.
  8. Animism as an Approach to Arda.Woody Evans - 2019 - IJALEL 4 (8):116-119.
    Here we examine qualities of what would be thought of as inanimate beings that lend evidence to the position that J.R.R. Tolkien’s fictional universe is animistic. Arda is full of life, and natural things in it, such as mountains and rivers, are often alive or conscious. A close look at the qualities of the stars in particular yields further evidence in favor of animism as a foundational ontology of Arda.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Pragmatism Without the “-Ism”: Cavell, Rhetoric, and the Role of Doctrines in Philosophy.Russell Johnson - 2019 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 40 (2):5.
    “If you will listen to me, I will say, do not involve yourselves in any –ism. Study every –ism. Ponder and assimilate what you have read and try to practice yourself what appeals to you out of it. But for heaven’s sake do not set out to establish any –ism.”William James’s 1907 treatise Pragmatism is the book in which James most clearly lays out the core tenets of pragmatism and makes arguments for pragmatism over against rival schools of philosophy. Precisely (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Rhetoric Through the Ages - MacDonald the Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Pp. XXIV + 819, Ills. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Cased, £97, Us$150. Isbn: 978-0-19-973159-6. [REVIEW]John Poulakos - 2019 - The Classical Review 69 (1):9-10.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Rhetoric and Medicine in Early Modern Europe, Edited by Stephen Pender and Nancy S. Struever, 2012.Teodoro Katinis - 2016 - Early Science and Medicine 21 (1):97-99.
  12. Rhetoric of Effortlessness in Science.James W. McAllister - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (2):145-166.
    Some classic historical vignettes depict scientists achieving breakthroughs without effort: Archimedes grasping the principles of buoyancy while bathing, Galileo Galilei discovering the isochrony of the pendulum while sitting in a cathedral, James Watt noticing the motive power of steam while passing time in a kitchen, Alexander Fleming finding penicillin in Petri dishes that he had omitted to clean before going on holiday. These stories suggest that, to establish important findings in science, hard work is not always necessary. In this article, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13. A Means-End Classification of Argumentation Schemes.Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - In Frans van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 183-201.
    One of the crucial problems of argumentation schemes as illustrated in (Walton, Reed & Macagno 2008) is their practical use for the purpose of analyzing texts and producing arguments. The high number and the lack of a classification criterion make this instrument extremely difficult to apply practically. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the structure of argumentation schemes and outline a possible criterion of classification based on alternative and mutually-exclusive possibilities. Such a criterion is based not on what (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  14. Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1): 26-53.
    The representation and classification of the structure of natural arguments has been one of the most important aspects of Aristotelian and medieval dialectical and rhetorical theories. This traditional approach is represented nowadays in models of argumentation schemes. The purpose of this article is to show how arguments are characterized by a complex combination of two levels of abstraction, namely, semantic relations and types of reasoning, and to provide an effective and comprehensive classification system for this matrix of semantic and quasilogical (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. Emotive Language in Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This book analyzes the uses of emotive language and redefinitions from pragmatic, dialectical, epistemic and rhetorical perspectives, investigating the relationship between emotions, persuasion and meaning, and focusing on the implicit dimension of the use of a word and its dialectical effects. It offers a method for evaluating the persuasive and manipulative uses of emotive language in ordinary and political discourse. Through the analysis of political speeches and legal arguments, the book offers a systematic study of emotive language in argumentation, rhetoric, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  16. LOGISCHE UND SEMANTISCHE FUNKTION DER PRÄPOSITIONEN IN LEIBNIZ’ SPRACHPHILOSOPHIE.Lucia Oliveri - 2014 - In Wenchao Li (ed.), Studia Leibnitiana - Supplementa 38 Einheit der Vernunft und Vielfalt der Sprachen Beiträge zu Leibniz' Sprachforschung und Zeichentheorie. Stoccarda, Germania: pp. 55-82.
    Eine Untersuchung der Präpositionen bei Leibniz kann aufgrund ihrer synkatego-rematischen Natur zeigen, in welchem Sinne die Sprache - als strukturiertes, bedeutendes Zeichensystem – das logische Verhältnis unter den Notionen ausdrü-cken kann, und damit der Zusammenhang zwischen Grammatik und Semantik einerseits, und Logik anderseits, erhellen. Meiner Ansicht nach bekommt auch Leibniz' Versuch des Aufbaus einer characteristica universalis dank dieser Per-spektive ein neues Forschungsinteresse. Um das Interesse für diese Redeteile zu wecken, werde ich zuvor in einem kurzen Exkurs die vorgängige Tradition dar-stellen. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Onwards Facing Backwards: The Rhetoric of Science in Nineteenth-Century Greece.Kostas Tampakis - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Science 47 (2):217-237.
    The aim of this paper is to show how the Greek men of science negotiated a role for their enterprise within the Greek public sphere, from the institution of the modern Greek state in the early 1830s to the first decades of the twentieth century. By focusing on instances where they appeared in public in their official capacity as scientific experts, I describe the rhetorical schemata and the narrative strategies with which Greek science experts engaged the discourses prevalent in nineteenth- (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18. Strategies of Character Attack.Fabrizio Macagno - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):1-33.
    Why are personal attacks so powerful? In political debates, speeches, discussions and campaigns, negative character judgments, aggressive charges and charged epithets are used for different purposes. They can block the dialogue, trigger value judgments and influence decisions; they can force the interlocutor to withdraw a viewpoint or undermine his arguments. Personal attacks are not only multifaceted dialogical moves, but also complex argumentative strategies. They can be considered as premises for further arguments based on signs, generalizations or consequences. They involve tactics (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  19. The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises. Presumptions in Enthymemes.Fabrizio Macagno & Giovanni Damele - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (3):361-389.
    The implicit dimension of enthymemes is investigated from a pragmatic perspective to show why a premise can be left unexpressed, and how it can be used strategically. The relationship between the implicit act of taking for granted and the pattern of presumptive reasoning is shown to be the cornerstone of kairos and the fallacy of straw man. By taking a proposition for granted, the speaker shifts the burden of proving its un-acceptability onto the hearer. The resemblance of the tacit premise (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (15 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  20. Ancient Rhetoric - E. Gunderson the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Pp. X + 355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Paper, £20.99, Us$37 . Isbn: 978-0-521-67786-8. [REVIEW]C. Watson - 2013 - The Classical Review 63 (1):46-48.
  21. Enthymemes, Argumentation Schemes, and Topics.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse 52 (205):39-56.
    This paper argues for a reinterpretation of Aristotle's concept of an enthymeme and also his wider informal logic in terms of arguments that are defeasible. They are represented by forms of argument that are called argumentation schemes, considered to be similar to forms of argument found in deductive logic, but different from the foregoing in virtue of their being defeasible. Indeed, the most interesting schemes have been put forward as a helpful way of characterizing structures of human reasoning that have (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  22. Mathematics and Rhetoric. Introduction.Giovanna Cifoletti - 2006 - Early Science and Medicine 11 (4):369-389.
  23. Between Medicine and Rhetoric.Stephen Pender - 2005 - Early Science and Medicine 10 (1):36-64.
    Inspired by Pierre-Jean-Georges Cabanis' claim in 1798 that physicians might learn forms of medical reasoning from les anciens rhéteurs, in this paper I explore intimate associations between medicine and rhetoric over the longue durée. Gravely susceptible to error, medical reasoning relies on signs and examples, both gleaned from experience and both the subject of rhetorical inquiry; like rhetoric, medicine reaches plausible conclusions from probable premises. Here, ranging from Hippocrates and Plato through Aristotle to early modern England, I argue that forms (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. C. Castelli: The Mother of the Sophists. La Tragedia Nei Trattati Greci di Retorica. Pp. 187. Milan: Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto, 2000. Paper, L. 33,000. ISBN: 88-7916-124-5. [REVIEW]Orlando Poltera - 2002 - The Classical Review 52 (2):376-377.
  25. The Mother of the Sophists. La Tragedia Nei Trattati Greci di Retorica. [REVIEW]Orlando Poltera - 2002 - The Classical Review 52 (2):376-377.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Seduction, Sophistry, and the Woman with the Rhetorical Figure.Michelle Ballif - 2001 - Siu Press.
    "Ballif questions why the profession wants to retain these beliefs in the face of vociferous arguments from "new rhetorics" that the discipline no longer posits a foundational self or truth, and in the face of the poststructuralist critique, which has demonstrated that founding truth is always accomplished by first positing and then negating an "other." As an alternative to this negative and violent rhetorical process, Ballif suggests a turn to sophistry as embodied in the figure of Woman, one with the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. H. Lausberg: Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study . Pp. Xxxi + 921. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 1998 . Cased, $240.50. ISBN: 90-04-10705-3. [REVIEW]Andrew Laird - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (1):313-314.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. S. Döpp : Antike Rhetorik und ihre Rezeption. Symposion zu Ehren von Professor Dr. Carl Joachim Classen D. Litt. Oxon. am 21. und 22. November 1998 in Göttingen. Pp. 181, ills. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1999. Paper, DM 88. ISBN: 3-515-07524-0. [REVIEW]Roland Mayer - 2000 - The Classical Review 50 (2):676-676.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Rhetoric and Scientific Controversies.Marcello Pera - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 50.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30. Semantic Flexibility in Scientific Practice: A Study of Newton's Optics.Michael Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 32 (3):210 - 232.
    Semantic essentialism holds that any scientific term that appears in a well-confirmed scientific theory has a fixed kernel of meaning. Semantic essentialism cannot make sense of the strategies scientists use to argue for their views. Newton's central optical expression "light ray" suggests a context-sensitive view of scientific language. On different occasions, Newton's expression could refer to different things depending on his particular argumentative goals - a visible beam, an irreducibly smallest section of propagating light, or a traveling particle of light. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31. E. A. Gondos: Auf dem Weg zur rhetorischen Theorie: Rhetorische Reflexion im ausgehenden fünften Jahrhundert v. Chr. Pp. 104. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1996. Paper, DM 68/öS 496/Sw. frs. 62. ISBN: 3-484-68010-5. [REVIEW]S. Usher - 1998 - The Classical Review 48 (1):206-206.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies.Jeanine Czubaroff - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.
    Acceptance of three tenets of the doctrine of scientific objectivity, namely, the tenets of consensus, compartmentalization, and ahistorical truth, undermines scientists‘ appreciation of the importance of scientific controversy and consideration of the policy and value implications of controversial scientific theories. This essay rejects these tenets and suggests scientists appreciate theoretical diversity, learn rational means for adjudicating value differences, and cultivate conversational as well as written forms of communication.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. L. Bahmer: Antike Rhetorik and Kommunikative Aufsatzdidaktik. Der Beitrag der Rhetorik zur Didaktik des Schreibens. Pp. xi+299. Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: George Olms, 1991. Paper, DM 49.80. [REVIEW]Ian Rutherford - 1995 - The Classical Review 45 (1):175-175.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. The Discourses of Science.Marcello Pera - 1994 - University of Chicago Press.
    In this much-anticipated revision and translation of Scienza e Retorica, Marcello Pera argues that rhetoric is central to the making of scientific knowledge. Pera begins with an attack of what he calls the "Cartesian syndrome"--the fixation on method common to both defenders of traditional philosophy of science and its detractors. He argues that in assuming the primacy of methodological rules, both sides get it wrong. Scientific knowledge is neither the simple mirror of nature nor a cultural construct imposed by contingent (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  35. Pera, M. And Shea, W. R. [1991]: "Persuading Science. The Art of Scientific Rhetoric". [REVIEW]Eleonora Montuschi - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):375.
  36. Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric. [REVIEW]Peter Dear - 1992 - British Journal for the History of Science 25 (3):387-388.
  37. The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies. Peter DearThe Rhetoric of Science. Alan G. GrossWriting Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Greg MyersA Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Lawrence J. Prelli. [REVIEW]Trevor Melia - 1992 - Isis 83 (1):100-106.
  38. "Rhetoric", by Renato Barilli. [REVIEW]Ann Vasaly - 1992 - Ancient Philosophy 12 (1):245.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Rhetoric, Topoi, and Scientific Revolutions.Kenneth S. Zagacki & William Keith - 1992 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 25 (1):59 - 78.
    Rhetorical scholars have become increasingly interested in the persuasive tactics and strategies that arise out of the communication that occurs in the course of doing science. Philosophically, two primary ways of approaching this intrinsic rhetoric of science, and the practice of science itself, have emerged. One is to look at the Community and practice of science as relatively stable, a progressive vision of scientists gradually making discoveries and weeding out error, passing along their knowledge and techniques to students. But a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40. Rhetoric and Theory of Choice in Science.Ernan McMullin - 1991 - In Marcello Pera & William R. Shea (eds.), Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric. Science History Publications, Usa. pp. 55--76.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Reviews : Michael Billig, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 (1987), Paper £9.95, Vi + 290 Pp. [REVIEW]Mike Michael - 1991 - History of the Human Sciences 4 (3):441-444.
  42. The First Sophists and Feminism: Discourses of the “Other”.Susan C. Jarratt - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (1):27-41.
    In this essay, I explore the parallel between the historical exclusions of rhetoric from philosophy and of women from fields of rational discourse. After considering the usefulness and limitations of deconstruction for exposing marginalization by hierarchical systems, I explore links between texts of the sophists and feminist proposals for rewriting/rereading history by Cixous, Spivak, and others. I conclude that sophistic rhetoric offers a flexible alternative to philosophy as an intellectual framework for mediating theoretical oppositions among contemporary feminisms.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43. Ronald H. Martin: The Epitoma Margarite Castigate Eloquentie of Laurentius Gulielmus Traversagni de Saona . Pp. V + 133. Leeds: Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society Ltd, 1986. Paper, £10. [REVIEW]R. P. H. Green - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (1):188-188.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Jean Dietz Moss : Rhetoric and Praxis. The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning. Pp. Xi+172. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1986. $ 24. [REVIEW]R. F. Stalley - 1987 - The Classical Review 37 (2):308-308.
  45. Descartes on Refraction: Scientific Versus Rhetorical Method.Bruce Eastwood - 1984 - Isis 75:481-502.
  46. Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emperors - George A. Kennedy: A History of Rhetoric, Vol. III: Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emperors. Pp. Xviii + 333. Princeton University Press, 1983. £30.20. [REVIEW]J. D. Frendo - 1984 - The Classical Review 34 (2):204-205.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Bacon's "Enchanted Glass".Katharine Park - 1984 - Isis 75:290-302.
  48. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1980 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (2):134-135.
  49. W. Eisenhut: Einführung in die antike Rhetorik und ihre Geschichte. Pp. 107. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974. Paper, DM. 19.50. [REVIEW]Michael Winterbottom - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):121-121.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. [REVIEW]Michael Winterbottom - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (2):321-322.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 54