Normativity

Edited by Federico L. G. Faroldi (Universita' degli Studi di Pavia)
About this topic
Summary

Defining 'normativity' is itself a normative task, and no clear agreement has been reached on the matter. The normative has often been contrasted with the descriptive; sometimes the normative is thought to be made up of deontic (e.g. 'oughts') and evaluative (e.g. 'good') concepts. 'Normativity' may have at least two senses: first, a nomophoric sense, if one refers to implicit or explicit rules (of various kinds); second, an axiological sense, if one refers to values. Few have defined normativity explicitly; many are interested in the normativity of something else (meaning and content, semantics, aesthetics, moral claims, epistemic norms, context, the law) rather than in normativity itself. When they do, normativity is usually explained (or explained away) with reference to "having reasons".

Key works The contemporary debate on normativity has various threads. A recent, fundamental work dealing directly with 'normativity' tout court is Thomson 2008. The normativity of morality and reason is investigated in Korsgaard 1996. For the normativity of meaning and content, one classical piece is surely Kripke 1982. Fundamental works for the normativity of the law are Kelsen 1967 and Kelsen 1990.
Introductions For an overview of contemporary work on normativity, see Finlay 2010
Related categories

715 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 715
Material to categorize
  1. La riduzione sociologica della normatività. Tre osservazioni sull’argomento di Stephen Turner.Pietro Salis - 2022 - L'ircocervo 21 (2):110-130.
    Stephen Turner claims that social science can explain away normativity. By exploiting a non-normative view of rationality and a causal view of belief, he claimed that normativist views are akin to what he calls Good Bad Theories (GBT). GBT are false accounts that play a role of social coordination like primitive rituals (Taboo and the like). Hence, “norms”, “commitments”, and “obligations” are just like Taboo and can be explained away as GBT. Normativism, as a consequence, is doomed to disappear in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. La riduzione sociologica della normatività. Tre osservazioni sull’argomento di Stephen Turner.Pietro Salis - 2022 - L'ircocervo 21 (2):110-130.
    Stephen Turner claims that social science can explain away normativity. By exploiting a non-normative view of rationality and a causal view of belief, he claimed that normativist views are akin to what he calls Good Bad Theories (GBT). GBT are false accounts that play a role of social coordination like primitive rituals (Taboo and the like). Hence, “norms”, “commitments”, and “obligations” are just like Taboo and can be explained away as GBT. Normativism, as a consequence, is doomed to disappear in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. The normativity of multiple social identity: from motivation to legitimacy.Z. V. Shevchenko & N. A. Fialko - 2022 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 22:58-66.
    _Purpose._ The authors of this article aim to reveal how motivation and legitimacy ensure the normativity of the structuring and genesis of multiple social identity. _Theoretical basis._ Social constructivism was chosen as a research methodology. It reveals social identity as an identity constructed by its bearer on the basis of ready-made versions of social identity proposed by social groups and society. Social circles, identified by Georg Simmel, unite representatives of different social groups into a wider oneness, which can be interpreted (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Normativity of Gender.R. A. Rowland - forthcoming - Noûs.
    There are important similarities between moral thought and talk and thought and talk about gender: disagreements about gender, like disagreements about morality, seem to be intractable and to outstrip descriptive agreement; and it seems coherent to reject any definition of what it is to be a woman in terms of particular social, biological, or other descriptive features, just as it seems coherent to reject any definition of what it is to be good or right in terms of any set of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. A new bridge principle for the normativity of logic.Francesco Orilia - 2022 - Theoria 88 (6):1274-1292.
    Logic appears to be normative for rational belief. The thesis of the normativity of logic holds that indeed logic has such a normative status. Gilbert Harman has questioned it, thereby giving rise to what has been called “Harman's skeptical challenge”. MacFarlane has clarified that in order to answer this challenge and support the normativity of logic, one needs a “bridge principle” that appropriately connects logical entailments and norms for belief, as well as relevant desiderata for the evaluation of candidate bridge (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Response‐dependence and normativity.Yifan Sun - 2022 - Theoria 88 (6):1128-1143.
    A non-normative, response-dependent view about morality can avoid metaphysical extravagance and explain why the extension of some non-normative concepts can non-accidentally match the extension of moral concepts. These features make it a plausible reductive account of moral properties. However, some philosophers believe that a response-dependent account of morality must contain an irreducibly normative component. I argue that it is impossible to defend such a position while retaining the response-dependent nature of morality in the ordinary sense. However, I believe that philosophers' (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Normative Primitivism and the Possibility of Practical Thought.Samuel David Steadman - 2022 - Dissertation, York University
    Reasons are essentially addressed to agents. Many contemporary efforts to illuminate this feature of reasons effectively reduce them to features of agents, e.g., to rationally-pruned desires, plans, or roles. Such reductive accounts neglect a second feature of reasons, namely, their capacity to transcend agential nature. They also neglect a feature of agents, namely, their orientation to normative entities as entities that transcend—and thus, that can guide and give shape to—agential nature. This dissertation offers a conception of the relation running from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. The Single-Minded Animal: Shared Intentionality, Normativity, and the Foundations of Discursive Cognition. [REVIEW]Carl B. Sachs - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (4):446-452.
    Stovall’s overall project in The Single-Minded Animal is to develop a new theory of discursive normativity: our ability to judge what we ought to think and what we ought to do according to rules th...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. How to Feel About Climate Change? An Analysis of the Normativity of Climate Emotions.Julia Mosquera & Kirsti M. Jylhä - 2022 - Humana Mente 30 (3):357-380.
    Climate change evokes different emotions in people. Recently, climate emotions have become a matter of normative scrutiny in the public debate. This phenomenon, which we refer to as the normativization of climate emotions, manifests at two levels. At the individual level, people are faced with affective dilemmas, situations where they are genuinely uncertain about what is the right way to feel in the face of climate change. At the collective level, the public debate reflects disagreement about which emotions are appropriate (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Choosing normativity after the “death of god”. Ethical implications of weak thought.Andrzej Kobyliński - 2020 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 56 (S2):197-213.
    The article aims to analyse the concept of normativity within the philosophy of weak thought developed by Gianni Vattimo. Weak thought refers to the idea of weakening the existence in the era of metaphysical demise, as well as a challenge to the Cartesian concept of the subject. This philosophical tradition does not entirely abandon moral normativity. Vattimo proposes a weak notion of normativity, i.e. persuasion, without claims of universal applicability. Weak normativity derives from dialogue and respect for tradition, as well (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Rorty and the Question of Normativity: Replies to Commentators on Reconstructing Pragmatism.Chris Voparil - 2022 - Contemporary Pragmatism 19 (4):430-459.
    This response to insightful commentaries on my book, from Richard Shusterman, Susan Dieleman, Raff Donelson, and Colin Koopman, takes up the recurring theme of the nature of normativity on a Rortyan view. To frame my individual replies, I revisit the Davidsonian account of epistemic interaction that influences Rorty’s mature view and suggest that the norms implicit in Davidsonian triangulation are insufficient to support Rorty’s antiauthoritarianism in ethics and epistemology. To address the resulting question of how to account for norms of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. History and normativity in political theory: the case of Rawls.Richard Bourke - 2023 - In Richard Bourke & Quentin Skinner (eds.), History in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Evidence and Epistemic Normativity.Daniel Buckley - 2022 - Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington
    Evidence is often taken to be “normative” for doxastic agents. For instance, we are told to apportion our beliefs to the evidence, to not believe a claim without seeking out countervailing evidence, and so on. But what accounts for the normativity of evidence? This dissertation is devoted to answering this question. In order to answer it, I develop a novel approach to the theory of epistemic normativity. According to my approach, epistemic norms structure a social practice of epistemic accountability. This (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Can pluralism account for the normativity of truth?Douglas Edwards - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):403-414.
    In this paper I assess whether truth pluralism can account for the normativity of truth. This is a key issue, as accommodating the idea that truth is normative is often presented as a main advantage that truth pluralism has over deflationism. The basis of the discussion is Engel’s critique of truth pluralism, which questions the view’s ability to account for the normativity of truth. I develop the ways truth pluralists of different sorts can respond to Engel’s critique, and explore the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Moderate truth pluralism and the structure of doxastic normativity.Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):355-376.
    According to moderate truth pluralism, there is a single property that qualifies as truth for any domain whatsoever. However, propositions concerning different domains may possess this single truth property in virtue of different properties. Empirical propositions may be true in virtue of corresponding to reality while legal propositions may be true in virtue of cohering with the body of law. Moderate pluralists claim that truth is a completely general doxastic norm: for any p, the belief that p is correct if (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Deliberation, action and normativity.Gustavo Ortiz Millán - 2013 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 36 (1):155-159.
    In this paper I comment on several aspects of Martin Seel’s paper “The Ability to Deliberate”, mainly on his claims that deliberation is a form of action, on his not very clear distinction between deliberation and thought, and on the relation between normativity and deliberation. There are also some comments on practical and theoretical reasoning, as well as on Seel’s characterization of reasons.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Evidence, Reasons, and Knowledge in the Reasons-First Program.Paul Silva & Sven Bernecker - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
    Mark Schroeder’s Reasons First is admirable in its scope and execution, deftly demonstrating the theoretical promise of extending the reasons-first approach from ethics to epistemology. In what follows we explore how (not) to account for the evidence-that relation within the reasons-first program owing to self-fulfilling and self-defeating beliefs, we explain how factive content views of evidence can be resilient in the face of Schroeder’s criticisms, and we explain how knowledge from falsehood threatens Schroeder’s view of knowledge. Along the way we (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Conversational Pressure: Normativity in Speech Exchanges[REVIEW]Sam Berstler - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (3):378-382.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Precedent as a path laid down in walking: Grounding intrinsic normativity in a history of response.Joshua Rust - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-32.
    While developments of a shared intellectual tradition, the enactivist approach and the organizational account proffer importantly different accounts of organismic normativity. Where enactivists tend to follow Hans Jonas, Andres Weber, and Francisco Varela in grounding intrinsic affordance norms in existential concern, organizational theorists such as Alvaro Moreno, Matteo Mossio, and Leonardo Bich seek a more deflationary account of these normative phenomena. Critiques directed at both of these accounts of organismic normativity motivate the introduction of the precedential account of organismic normativity, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. 3 Dogmas of Normativity.Ruth Chang - forthcoming - Journal of Applied Philosophy.
    In this article, I identify and critically examine 3 dogmas of normativity that support a commonly accepted ‘Passivist View' of rational agency. I raise some questions about these dogmas, suggest what we should believe in their place, and moot an alternative ‘Activist View' of what it is to be a rational agent that grows out of rejection of the 3 dogmas. Underwriting the dogmas and the Passivist View, I suggest, is a deeply held but mistaken assumption that the normative domain (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. The Aporia of Justice: Constellations of Normativity in Honneth, Derrida, and Levinas.Sergej Seitz - 2021 - Levinas Studies 15:37-58.
    As Axel Honneth argues in his early essay “The Other of Justice,” Derrida and Levinas offer convincing arguments for offsetting practical philosophy’s traditional focus on justice with a focus on care. In Honneth, this leads to a strict dichotomy of justice (as equal treatment) and care (as singular responsibility). I show that Derrida and Levinas think of justice and responsibility not as dichotomic, but rather as aporetic. In all ethico-political conflicts, aspects of responsibility and justice are in play that are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. The Aporia of Justice: Constellations of Normativity in Honneth, Derrida, and Levinas.Sergej Seitz - 2021 - Levinas Studies 15:37-58.
    As Axel Honneth argues in his early essay “The Other of Justice,” Derrida and Levinas offer convincing arguments for offsetting practical philosophy’s traditional focus on justice with a focus on care. In Honneth, this leads to a strict dichotomy of justice (as equal treatment) and care (as singular responsibility). I show that Derrida and Levinas think of justice and responsibility not as dichotomic, but rather as aporetic. In all ethico-political conflicts, aspects of responsibility and justice are in play that are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Towards a socio-legal understanding of normativity.Matthias Baier - 2013 - In Social and legal norms: towards a socio-legal understanding of normativity. Ashgate.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Institutions and norms in collaboration : towards a framework for analyzing law and normativity in inter-organizational collaboration.Susanna Johansson - 2013 - In Matthias Baier (ed.), Social and legal norms: towards a socio-legal understanding of normativity. Ashgate.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Social and legal norms: towards a socio-legal understanding of normativity.Matthias Baier (ed.) - 2013 - Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. On Three Dogmas of Normativity.Philip Pettit - forthcoming - Journal of Applied Philosophy.
    Ruth Chang argues against three dogmas of normativity. Her argument, as least about the first two, is defensible, but defensible on a naturalistic account of normativity that she may not find congenial.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Freedom and normativity : varieties of free will.Barbara Merker - 2012 - In Michael Kühler & Nadja Jelinek (eds.), Autonomy and the Self. Springer.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. The normativity of what we care about: a love-based theory of practical reasons.Katrien Schaubroeck - 2013 - Leuven: Leuven University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. ch. 37. Inferentialism and normativity.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2013 - In Michael Beaney (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. On Three Dogmas of Normativity.Philip Pettit - forthcoming - Journal of Applied Philosophy.
    Journal of Applied Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Inquiring Further: Essays on Epistemic Normativity.Elise Woodard - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    My dissertation defends the importance of epistemic norms on what I call ‘inquiring further.’ Inquiring further is a familiar practice we engage in when we redeliberate, gather more evidence, or double-check our beliefs. Nonetheless, many philosophers have argued that norms governing further inquiry are at most practical or moral norms. Against this, I argue that norms on inquiring further are central to our understanding of responsible epistemic agency. I do this by appealing to both the roles of epistemic evaluations and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. On unfamiliar moral territory : about variant embodiment, enhancement, and normativity.Jackie Leach Scully - 2014 - In Miriam Eilers, Katrin Grüber & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter (eds.), The human enhancement debate and disability: new bodies for a better life. Palgrave-Macmillan.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Political Normativity.Adrian Kreutz & Enzo Rossi - forthcoming - Political Studies Review.
    Do salient normative claims about politics require moral premises? Political moralists think they do, political realists think they do not. We defend the viability of realism in a two-pronged way. First, we show that a number of recent attacks on realism, as well as realist responses to those attacks, unduly conflate distinctively political normativity and non-moral political normativity. Second, we argue that Alex Worsnip and Jonathan Leader-Maynard’s recent attack on realist arguments for a distinctively political normativity depends on assuming moralism (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34. The counterfactual yardstick: normativity, self-constitutionalisation and the public sphere.Karolina M. Cern - 2014 - Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. History, normativity, and rights.Paul Patton - 2014 - In Costas Douzinas & Conor Gearty (eds.), The meanings of rights: the philosophy and social theory of human rights. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. Clarifying Core Elements of New Testament Normativity.Thomas Finegan - 2023 - Studies in Christian Ethics 36 (1):84-106.
    An intriguing though little noticed trend within moral theology over the last half century or so is the move towards re-conceptualising moral norms previously considered mandatory into ideals. The ideal-normative turn has been taken by official Catholic and Anglican ecclesial documents, in both cases as regards the closely related matters of marital permanence and extra/post-marital unions. Yet the turn has occurred with little or no scrutiny of the distinction at its heart, that between ideal and mandatory norms. This article applies (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37. Normativity, Rationality and Reasoning: Selected Essays.John Broome - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    This volume is a selection of Broome's recent papers on normativity, rationality, and reasoning. It covers a variety of topics such as the meanings of 'ought', 'reason', and 'reasons'; the fundamental structure of normativity and the metaphysical priority of ought over reasons; the ownership - or agent-relativity - of oughts and reasons; the distinction between rationality and normativity; the notion of rational motivation; what characterizes the human activity of reasoning, and what is the role of normativity within it; the nature (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38. Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What It Explains.Ernest Sosa - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    An important book by the world's most eminent epistemologist. In Epistemic Explanations Sosa develops an improved virtue epistemology and uses it to explain several epistemic phenomena.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  39. Shifty Speech and Independent Thought: Epistemic Normativity in Context.Mona Simion - 2021 - Oxford University Press.
    This work is a manifesto for epistemic independence: the independence of good thinking from practical considerations. It presents a functionalist account of the normativity of assertion in conjunction with an integrated view of the normativity of constative speech acts.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  40. The Division of Normativity and a Defence of Demanding Moral Theories.Elizabeth Ventham - forthcoming - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-15.
    Morality, according to some theories, demands a lot of us. One way to defend such demanding moral theories is through an appeal to the division of normativity; on this picture, morality is only one of the normative domains that guides us, so it should be expected that we often fail to follow that guidance. This paper defends the division of normativity as a response to demandingness objections against an alternative: moral rationalism. It does this by addressing and refuting three arguments: (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. What is distinctive of political normativity? From domain view to role view.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - forthcoming - Sage Journals: Philosophy and Social Criticism.
    Philosophy & Social Criticism, Ahead of Print. In the last couple of years, increased attention has been directed at the question of whether there is such a thing as a distinctively political normativity. With few exceptions, this question has so far only been explored by political realists. However, the discussion about a distinctively political normativity raises methodological and meta-theoretical questions of general importance for political theory. Although the terminology varies, it is a widely distributed phenomenon within political theory to rely (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Introduction to In Dialogue with Putnam: Pragmatism, Realism, and Normativity.Giancarlo Marchetti - 2021 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 13 (2).
    Five years have passed since the death of Hilary Putnam. Through this symposium, we would like to celebrate the thought and work of one of the most influential, imaginative, fine, distinctive, and often provocative minds in twentieth-century American philosophy. We do not seek to do this through an entirely eulogizing approach; rather, we want to recognize the limits and challenges of his thought, as well as its potential generativity. The authors of this symposium engage with Putnam’s work n...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. What is distinctive of political normativity? From domain view to role view.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
    In the last couple of years, increased attention has been directed at the question of whether there is such a thing as a distinctively political normativity. With few exceptions, this question has...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Remarks on Farley and Gould’s “A Rossian Account of the Normativity of Logic”.Dave Beisecker - 2022 - Southwest Philosophy Review 38 (2):25-28.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity: From Old Liberties to New Precedence.Ulrike Müssig (ed.) - 2018 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
    This second volume of ReConFort, published open access, addresses the decisive role of constitutional normativity, and focuses on discourses concerning the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of power, judiciary as constituted power). In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, constitutional normativity began to complete the legal fixation (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Strange bedfellows? : onntology, normativity, critical realism, and queer theory.Timothy Rutzou - 2018 - In Timothy Rutzou & George Steinmetz (eds.), Critical realism, history, and philosophy in the social sciences. Emerald Publishing.
  47. Living with rules: Wittgensteinian reflections on normativity.Ondřej Beran - 2018 - New York: Peter Lang Edition.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Wittgenstein on aesthetic normativity and grammar.Hanne Appelqvist - 2018 - In David G. Stern (ed.), Wittgenstein in the 1930s: Between the Tractatus and the Investigations. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. The vulnerability of reality: Austin, normativity, and excuses.Sandra Laugier - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50. Grounding the normativity of law: the role of transcendental argumentation in Kelsen's critique of natural law theory.Ana Dimiskovska - 2019 - In Peter Langford, Ian Bryan & John McGarry (eds.), Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition. Brill.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 715