Summary |
Characteristically
for Husserlian phenomenology, whatever we can legitimately say about the self is
closely paralleled by an account of the data and workings of self-awareness. On the one hand, Husserl
speaks about the self (“the monad”) as the experienced totality of one’s life.
Within it, we can abstractively distinguish constitutive levels, all the way
down to the pre-egological flow of time-consciousness, quite unlike our ordinary experiences
of ourselves. On the other hand, Husserl’s later account of intentional acts
involves the idea of an ego-pole, an aspect of intentional experiences,
conceived as the opposite of an object-pole. In our intentional lives, the
ego-pole is the source and center of performance and activity, including
the action of predication. One way in which we can be aware of our selves is by
regarding them reflectively, as in phenomenological reflection. However, for Husserl,
the primary self-awareness is pre-reflective. In Husserl-scholarship, this
pre-reflective self-awareness has been identified with the absolute flow of
time-consciousness. |