This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related

Contents
21 found
Order:
  1. Must a sign be repeatable?Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
    This paper contests a point that Jacques Derrida and John Searle actually agree on, within their infamous debate: that a sign must be repeatable. I focus on a situation involving dissent when evaluating this claim.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. The Truth That Hurts, or the Corps à Corps of Tongues: An Interview with Jacques Derrida.Thomas Clément Mercier, Jacques Derrida & Évelyne Grossman - 2019 - Parallax 25 (1):8-24.
    In this 2004 interview — translated into English and published in its entirety for the first time — Jacques Derrida reflects upon his practices of writing and teaching, about the community of his readers, and explores questions related to corporeity and textuality, sexual difference, desire, politics, Marxism, violence, truth, interpretation, and translation. In the course of the interview, Derrida discusses the work of Martin Heidegger, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Maurice Blanchot, Hélène Cixous, Jean Genet, Paul Celan, and many others.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. Dire et penser “je”: la vacuité de la présence à soi du sujet de Husserl à Derrida.Pierre-Jean Renaudie - 2016 - Discipline Filosofiche (1):69-92.
    According to Jacques Derrida, the tradition of metaphysics is dominated by a basic distinction between presence and absence that plays a fundamental role in Husserl’s theory of meaning and contaminates the core of his phenomenological project. If Husserl’s distinction between indication and expression in the 1st Logical Investigation is credited for opening a ‘phenomenological breakthrough’, his account of the entwinement between the indicative and expressive functions of linguistic signs is accused of restoring and maintaining the metaphysical primacy of presence. In (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. On morality of speech: Cavell’s critique of Derrida. [REVIEW]Espen Dahl - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101.
    This article tries to bring out the implication of Cavell’s critical comments on Derrida, clustered around Cavell’s charge that deconstruction entails a flight from the ordinary. Cavell’s and Derrida’s different readings of Austin’s ordinary language philosophy provide a common ground for elaborating their respective positions. Their writings are at once the closest but also the most divergent when addressing the moral implication of speech, or more precisely, when addressing their understanding of responsibility and voice. Employing Derrida’s so-called ‘double reading’ as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate.Stanley Raffel - 2011 - Human Studies 34 (3):277-292.
    This paper revisits the Derrida-Searle debate, an exchange that, unfortunately, did not lead to much, if any, mutual understanding. I will suggest that this failure can be traced back to key features of their respective theories. In that Searle and Derrida use their own theories of speech as resources in trying to understand each other, their unsuccessful communication can be used to reveal a great deal about the limitations of both their theories. My paper tries to draw out these limitations (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy.James Chase & Jack Reynolds - 2010 - Montréal: Routledge. Edited by Jack Reynolds.
    Throughout much of the twentieth century, the relationship between analytic and continental philosophy has been one of disinterest, caution or hostility. Recent debates in philosophy have highlighted some of the similarities between the two approaches and even envisaged a post-continental and post-analytic philosophy. Opening with a history of key encounters between philosophers of opposing camps since the late nineteenth century - from Frege and Husserl to Derrida and Searle - the book goes on to explore in detail the main methodological (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  7. On Parasitic Language.Manjulika Ghosh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:43-48.
    This paper is about the uses of language which the Oxford philosopher of language, J.L. Austin excluded from theoretical consideration in his William James Lectures delivered in 1955 and posthumously published as How to Do Things with Words. Uses of language, such as dramatic, poetic or comedic, are said by Austin to be non-serious, deviant and parasitic upon the everyday normal ordinary language. This leaves literature out of consideration as an etiolation. Derrida, who is not merely a trained philosopher but (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Impossible speech acts.Andrew Parker - 2007 - In Martin McQuillan (ed.), The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy. Pluto Press. pp. 66--77.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Itérabilité et parasitisme: Essai sur le débat entre Searle et Derrida autour du langage et de l'intentionnalité.Delphine Didderen - 2006 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique.
    Le but de cet article est de présenter et de discuter le débat qui opposa Searle à Derrida sur les questions du langage et de l'intentionnalité. L'auteur montre que les enjeux de ce débat dépassent largement la réappropriation de la philosophie du langage d'Austin, et qu'il nous fait pénétrer au cœur même de la problématique du langage. Derrida stigmatise dans la théorie du langage de Searle un avatar de la pensée de la présence, qu'il faut déconstruire. En adoptant une stratégie (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Iterability and the order-word plateau: 'A politics of the performative' in Derrida and deleuze/guattari.C. J. - 2003 - Critical Horizons 4 (2):227-264.
    This paper offers a comparative analysis of the uses and formulations of speech-act theory in Derrida's and Deleuze/Guattari's work. It begins by juxtaposing Derrida's concept/nonconcept of 'iterability' to Deleuze and Guattari's conception of the 'order-word' and then examines these theories of the speech act in terms of their implications and consequences for a politics of resistance. Whereas Deleuze and Guattari generate a detailed material stratum — an order-word plateau — for exploring the performative in socio-political contexts, Derrida attends to the (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Without alibi.Jacques Derrida - 2002 - Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Edited by Peggy Kamuf.
    This brings together five pieces written by Jacques Derrida as extended lectures. The most important theme is Derrida's redefinition of speech acts and the 'event' as a particular kind of performative. The effects of globalization and mechanization, along with arising issues, provide a second constellation of themes. The first four essays involve a specific act of speech: the lie, the excuse, perjury and profession. The last two essays continue Derrida's powerful series of meditations on professional and institutional questions. The final (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  12. Language, philosophy and the risk of failure: Rereading the debate between Searle and Derrida. [REVIEW]Hagi Kenaan - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):117-133.
    In this paper I return to one of the central points of contention in the renowned debate between John Searle and Jacques Derrida with the aim of rethinking the role of success and the place of failure in communication. What is the philosophical significance of Austin's decision to exclude from his investigation (in How to Do Things with Words) certain utterances that cannot qualify as successful? Examining the conflicting ways in which Searle and Derrida understand and respond to Austin, I (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13. How rational can a polemic across the analytic -continental 'divide' be?Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):313 – 339.
    In spite of the widespread belief that there is (or at least there was) a clearcut and deep opposition between two forms of philosophizing vaguely characterized as 'continental' and 'analytic', it is not easy to find actual examples of debates between philosophers that clearly belong to the opposed camps. Perhaps the reason is that, on the assumption that the alleged 'divide' is so deep, each side feels that there is no point in arguing against the other, for argumentation would quickly (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  14. Has Derrida Deconstructed Speech Act Theory?Dieter Freundlieb - 2001 - Idealistic Studies 31 (2-3):81-103.
    I argue that Derrida's critique of speech act theory is largely unsustainable because of its reliance on a questionable and insufficiently explicatedconception of philosophy as negative metaphysics8 and its attendant misconception of scientific theory construction in general and speech act theory in particular.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida. by Cavell Stanley Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell (1995). x + 200 pp. [REVIEW]David E. Cooper - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (275):164-167.
  16. Derrida and Analytical Philosophy: Speech Acts and their Force.Sarah Richmond - 1996 - European Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):38-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17. Philosophical passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida.Stanley Cavell - 1995 - Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
  18. Is a science of language possible? The Derrida‐Searle debate.Alan G. Gross - 1994 - Social Epistemology 8 (4):345 – 359.
  19. Another Look at the Derrida-Searle Debate.Mark Alfino - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (2):143 - 152.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. Iterability and meaning: The Searle-Derrida debate.Frank B. Farrell - 1988 - Metaphilosophy 19 (1):53–64.
  21. Positing and iterability: Jacques Derrida's thought of the performative.Mauro Senatore - unknown
    In Memoires for Paul de Man Derrida acknowledges the urgency, for any rigorous deconstruction, of closely confronting Austin's notion of the performative. This study aims to countersign Derrida' s acknowledgement by elaborating a certain deconstructive tradition of thinking the performativity of the performative and, thus, of retracing the performative back to the modem philosophical tradition of positing. In particular, it focuses on Derrida's thought of the iterability of the performative, as the speech act of self-positing. The chapters investigate Derrida's elaboration (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark