Contents
28 found
Order:
  1. Le langage. Lectures d’Aristote.Gazziero Leone (ed.) - 2021 - Leuven: Peeters.
    Even though Aristotle speaks often about language, his remarks do not fall within the province of any given discipline, let alone belong to the same subject matter or amount to a πραγματεία of their own. Rather, they are somewhat scattered across the Aristotelian corpus and are to be gleaned from a vast array of texts, including ethical and political writings (where language plays a remarkable role in shaping human sociability), treatises on natural history (where Aristotle outlines the physiology of phonation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Aristotle’s Semantic Thinking and his Notion of Signification in De interpretatione 1 and Beyond.Simon Noriega-Olmos - 2021 - In Gazziero Leone (ed.), Le langage. Lectures d’Aristote. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 81–142.
    Abstract. This study analyses and assesses the notion of « signification » deployed in « De int. » 1 and its role in the whole of « De int. » Four main conclusions are reached: (i) The semantic observations of « De int. » 1 provide linguistic elements and linguistic background to explain contrary pairs, contradictory pairs, statement-making-sentences, and truth and falsehood. (ii) In « De int. » 1, Aristotle restricts his semantic interests to elements and relations necessary for explaining (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. (9 other versions)Вчерашнее сражение за завтрашнее морское сражение (A Yesterday Battle over the Tomorrow Sea Battle).Pavel Butakov - 2019 - Schole 13 (2):657-669.
    The appropriationist approach to history of philosophy is often accused of being antihistorical and thus unreliable. The appropriationists are only concerned with their own philosophical problems, and they make discriminating use of the historical data as far as it serves their needs. Its rival, the contextualist approach, claims to be an honest, dedicated and reliable treatment of history. The contextualists are willing to make use of the tedious methodology of Classical studies as long as it promises to uncover the true (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Ontological Status of Human Speech in Aristotle‘s "Categories".Pavol Labuda - 2019 - Filosoficky Casopis 67 (6):877-894.
    The subject of this paper is the issue of human speech in Aristotle, especially in his work Categories. Its primary goal is to elaborate an interpretation of Aristotle’s statements about human speech as a quantity (Cat. 4b20–b39, 5a15–b2) that would allow them to fit reasonably into the whole of Aristotle’s theory of language. The structure of the paper is as follows. In the first part a certain approach to the question of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s theory of language is proposed. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Empty Negations and Existential Import in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2018 - Apeiron 51 (2):201-219.
    Aristotle draws what are, by our lights, two unusual relationships between predication and existence. First, true universal affirmations carry existential import. If ‘All humans are mortal’ is true, for example, then at least one human exists. And secondly, although affirmations with empty terms in subject position are all false, empty negations are all true: if ‘Socrates’ lacks a referent, then both ‘Socrates is well’ and ‘Socrates is ill’ are false but both ‘Socrates is not well’ and ‘Socrates is not ill’ (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6. Nomes infinitos: referência e contexto.Heronides Moura - 2017 - Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 59 (1):1-12.
  7. John Duns Scotus. Duns Scotus on Time and Existence: The Questions on Aristotle’s “De interpretatione.” Trans. and ed. Edward Buckner and Jack Zupko. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014. Pp. 376. $69.95. [REVIEW]Richard Cross - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):352-353.
  8. Platonic and Aristotelian Influences in the Philosophy of Language: A Case for the Priority of the Cratylus.Hayden Kee - 2016 - Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 32:72-82.
    Aristotle’s De Interpretatione has been referred to as the most influential text to be written in the history of semantics. I argue, however, that it is Plato who lays the foundation for subsequent reflection on signification. In the Cratylus, Plato confronts the two prevalent views of his time on the nature of the relationship between a name and a thing named: conventionalism, which holds that there is an arbitrary, imposed relationship between names and what they name; and naturalism, which holds (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Categorias, Da Interpretação (Aristóteles, Obras Completas).Ricardo Santos - 2016 - Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional - Casa da Moeda.
  10. Aristotle on Predication.Phil Corkum - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):793-813.
    A predicate logic typically has a heterogeneous semantic theory. Subjects and predicates have distinct semantic roles: subjects refer; predicates characterize. A sentence expresses a truth if the object to which the subject refers is correctly characterized by the predicate. Traditional term logic, by contrast, has a homogeneous theory: both subjects and predicates refer; and a sentence is true if the subject and predicate name one and the same thing. In this paper, I will examine evidence for ascribing to Aristotle the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  11. The Thirteenth-Century Notion of Signification: The Discussions and Their Origin and Development.Ana María Mora-Márquez - 2015 - Boston: Brill.
    This book presents an exhaustive study of the three 13-century discussions explicitly dealing with the notion of Significatio. The study aims to show that the three discussions emerge because of apparently opposite claims about the signification of words in the authoritative literature of the period. It also shows that the three discussions develop in the same direction - towards a unified use of the notion of signification, which keeps its explanatory role in semiotics, but loses its role in grammar and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  12. Es la respuesta de Aristóteles al argumento de fatalismo en De Interpretatione 9 exitosa?” / “Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?Michael Anthony Istvan - 2014 - Ideas Y Valores 63 (154).
    My aim is to figure out whether Aristotle’s response to the argument for fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 is successful. By “response” here I mean not simply the reasons he offers to highlight why fatalism does not accord with how we conduct our lives, but also the solution he devises to block the argument he provides for it. Achieving my aim hence demands that I figure out what exactly is the argument for fatalism he voices, what exactly is his solution, (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. ARISTOTLE, DE INTERPRETATIONE- (S.) Noriega-Olmos Aristotle's Psychology of Signification. A Commentary on De Interpretatione 16 a 3–18. (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 303.) Pp. x + 185. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2013. Cased, €79.95, US$112. ISBN: 978-3-11-028765-3. [REVIEW]Ana Maria Mora-Marquez - 2014 - The Classical Review 64 (2):403-404.
  14. O conceito de significado no Peri Hermeneias de Aristóteles.Janio Alves - 2012 - Dissertation, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul
  15. Notas sobre a definição do enunciado asseverativo (logos apophantikos) em Aristóteles.Paulo Ferreira - 2011 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 5 (1):2.
    In view of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s and Porphyry’s respective positions on the issue, I discuss whether logos apophantikos is to be defined, as DI 4 seems to imply, by its being true or false or rather, as DI 5 seems to imply, by its representing the ontological combination/separation of substrate and attribute through the logical combination/separation of subject and predicate.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Peri hermeneias 16a3-8: Histoire d'une rupture de la tradition interprétative dans le Bas moyen âge.Ana María Mora-Márquez - 2011 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 136 (1):67 - 84.
    Nous proposons de montrer une rupture que la tradition interprétative médiévale du passage 16a3-8 du De interpretations a subie dans la seconde moitié du XIIIe siècle. On met ainsi en évidence que, dans cette même période, s'est façonnée une nouvelle théorie de la signification, qu'on retrouve notamment dans l'œuvre de théologiens franciscains ou proches des idées franciscaines, opposée sur des points fondamentaux à celle qui a été transmise par Boèce dans son deuxième commentaire du De interpretations. The aim of this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. (1 other version)The Principle of Bivalence in De interpretatione 4.Francesco Ademollo - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38:97-113.
    In De int. 9 Aristotle argues that some declarative sentences are neither true nor false. This raises the problem of how we should understand the words of ch. 4, which introduces the declarative sentence as ‘that in which being true or being false holds’. In this paper I remove the contradiction by arguing that in ch. 4 Aristotle does not intend to claim that *all* declarative sentences are either true or false, but rather that *only* they are either true or (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  18. (1 other version)Breve análise da relação entre escrita, fala, pensamento e coisas no primeiro capítulo do De Interpretatione.Thiago Silva Freitas Oliveira - 2010 - Prometheus 6:51-59.
  19. (1 other version)Aristotle's logic at the university of buffalo's department of philosophy.John Corcoran - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (140):99-117.
    We begin with an introductory overview of contributions made by more than twenty scholars associated with the Philosophy Department at the University of Buffalo during the last half-century to our understanding and evaluation of Aristotle's logic. More well-known developments are merely mentioned in..
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20. (1 other version)Comentario a las primeras líneas del capítulo primero de "De interpretatione" de Aristóteles.Claudio Veloso - 2005 - Tópicos 28:87-120.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Ontologia e Predicação em Aristóteles.Lucas Angioni - 2000 - Campinas, Brazil: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de Campinas.
    Este livro é um 'ancestral' em pré-print do meu livro de 2006, Introdução à Teoria da Predicação em Aristóteles (ISBN 978-85-268-0716-1), publicado pela Editora da Unicamp (ver https://www.academia.edu/6912408/Introdu%C3%A7%C3%A3o_%C3%A0_teoria_da_predica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_em_Arist %C3%B3teles). O ancestral foi felizmente muito citado, mesmo depois da aparição do livro definitivo em 2006. -/- This is an ancestor (in pré-print) of my 2006 Book, 'Introdução à Teoria da Predicação em Aristóteles' (ISBN 978-85-268-0716-1), published by Editora da Unicamp (see https://www.academia.edu/6912408/Introdu%C3%A7%C3%A3o_%C3%A0_teoria_da_predica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_em_Arist %C3%B3teles). The ancestor was cited by many, even after the definitive book (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  22. (2 other versions)Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. [REVIEW]Christos Y. Panayides - 1999 - Ancient Philosophy 19 (2):416-421.
  23. F. W. Zimmermann: Al-Farabi's Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De Interpretatione. Pp. clii + 287. Oxford: O.U.P. for the British Academy, 1981 . Paper, £22.50. [REVIEW]James E. Montgomery - 1989 - The Classical Review 39 (1):143-144.
  24. ...denn das Sein oder Nichtsein ist kein Merkmal der Sache..Erwin Sonderegger - 1989 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 43 (3):489–508.
    Aristotle’s De Interpretatione opens with some norms designed to guide philosophical discour- se. One of these norms–of greatest importance for the discourse about being–is the distinction between the affirmation and the content of a proposition. No verb, not even the verb to be, will by itself state the existence of its content. – The oppositon to the traditional interpretation of the text in this article is primarily founded on observations of ordinary Greek speech. ”A verb uttered just by itself“ doesn’t (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. [REVIEW]Alfred L. Ivry - 1988 - Ancient Philosophy 8 (2):309-312.
  26. The Clarendon Categories and de Interpretatione. [REVIEW]D. W. Hamlyn - 1964 - The Classical Review 14 (3):264-265.
  27. Aristotle’s on Interpretation, with Commentary by St. Thomas and Cajetan. [REVIEW] Staff - 1963 - International Philosophical Quarterly 3 (4):635-636.
  28. The Categoriae and De Interpretatione of Aristotle. [REVIEW]D. A. Rees - 1951 - The Classical Review 1 (1):26-27.