This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

1077 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 1077
Material to categorize
  1. Megaric Metaphysics.Dominic Bailey - 2012 - Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):303-321.
  2. Relativity, Categories and Principles in the Divisio Aristotelea 67M/32DL.Roberto Granieri - forthcoming - Journal of Hellenic Studies.
    The Divisio Aristotelea 67M/32DL establishes a distinction between two categories of beings, per se and relatives. I defend three main theses. First, the relation of dependence characterizing the members of the πρός τι category is modal and symmetrical in nature and, accordingly, the per se-relatives contrast cannot be equivalent to the substance-accidents contrast. Second, the type of relativity relevant to this divisio is both ontological and semantic in nature (but with different emphases depending on the version of the divisio considered). (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Systems of Predication. Aristotle’s Categories in Topics, I, 9.Roberto Granieri - 2016 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 27:1-18.
    In this paper I investigate Aristotle’s account of predication in Topics I 9. I argue for the following interpretation. In this chapter Aristotle (i) presents two systems of predication cutting across each other, the system of the so-called four ‘predicables’ and of the ten ‘categories’, in order to distinguish them and explore their mutual relationship. I propose a semantic interpretation of the relationship between them. According to this reading, every proposition formed through a predicable constitutes at the same time a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. (S.) Ebbesen Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi: A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies. 1. The Greek Tradition. Pp. Ix + 355. 2. Greek Texts and Fragments of the Latin Translation of “Alexander's” Commentary. Pp. Xxxvii + 556. 3. Appendices, Danish Summary, Indices. Pp. Iv + 415. (Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum 7, 1—3.) Leiden: Brill. 1981. Fl. 192 (3 Vols). [REVIEW]A. C. Lloyd - 1986 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 106:231-233.
  5. La distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis comprendida de modo intensional.Matı́as Von Dem Bussche - 2019 - Mutatis Mutandis: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 14.
    El siguiente artı́culo intenta defender la tesis de que la distinción aristotélica entre enérgeia y kı́nesis debe ser comprendida de modo intensional (en contraposición a una lectura extensional), tomando como punto de partida su célebre aparición en Met IX 6. Sobre la base de la identificación del problema acerca del cual trata dicho pasaje, se toma en consideración otras apariciones de la distinción en Met IX 8, en la EE, en la EN y en otros textos, en orden a documentar, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Sullogismos and Sullogizesqai in Aristotle's Organon.James Duerlinger - 1969 - American Journal of Philology 90 (3):320.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.Friedrich Solmsen - 1941 - American Journal of Philology 62 (1):35.
  8. Sullogismoi ec Upoqesews in Aristotle.Paul Shorey - 1889 - American Journal of Philology 10 (4):460.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic.Phillip de Lacy & Ernst Kapp - 1944 - American Journal of Philology 65 (3):305.
  10. Filosofía vs. erística según platón Y aristóteles: Acerca de la distinción entre estar problematizado Y hablar Por el gusto de hablar.Graciela E. Marcos - 2020 - Argos 1 (38):7-29.
    En este artículo pretendo echar luz sobre la distinción entre filosofía y erística en Platón y Aristóteles, dirigiendo la atención a la noción de aporía. En la sección I, sobre la base de un examen de las ocurrencias de eristikós en Menón, intento mostrar que Sócrates aparece estrechamente conectado al erístico, quien suele ser presentado como su oponente más peligroso. En la sección II, analizo la taxonomía de Aristóteles de los opositores al principio de no-contradicción en Metafísica IV, con el (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Mediated Predication in Aristotle's Categories.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - forthcoming - Ancient Philosophy.
    I argue there are two ways predication relations can hold according to the Categories: they can hold directly or they can hold mediately. The distinction between direct and mediated predication is a distinction between whether or not a given prediction fact holds in virtue of another predication fact’s holding. We can tell Aristotle endorses this distinction from multiple places in the text where he licenses an inference from one predication fact’s holding to another predication fact’s holding. The best explanation for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. The Ontological Status of Human Speech in Aristotle‘s "Categories".Pavol Labuda - 2019 - Filosoficky Casopis 67 (6):877-894.
    The subject of this paper is the issue of human speech in Aristotle, especially in his work Categories. Its primary goal is to elaborate an interpretation of Aristotle’s statements about human speech as a quantity (Cat. 4b20–b39, 5a15–b2) that would allow them to fit reasonably into the whole of Aristotle’s theory of language. The structure of the paper is as follows. In the first part a certain approach to the question of the reconstruction of Aristotle’s theory of language is proposed. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Waterlow Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1982. Pp. [Vi] + 165. £10.50. [REVIEW]Michael J. White - 1984 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 104:212-214.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. By J. Łukasiewicz. Pp. Xi + 141. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951. 15s. [REVIEW]D. J. Allan - 1953 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:158-159.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Rose Aristotle's Syllogistic. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas. 1968. Pp. Vii + 149. $8.50.D. W. Hamlyn - 1969 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 89:165-166.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Lear Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge Etc.: University Press. 1980. Pp. Xi + 123. £8.95.A. R. Lacey - 1981 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 101:157-158.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Ntroduzione E Commento.J. D. G. Evans - 1980 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 100:225.
  18. K. J. J. Hintikka: On the Interpretation of ‘De Interpretatione’ XII–XIII; J. M. E. Moravcsik: Being and Meaning in the ‘Sophist’. Pp. 78. Helsinki: Akateeminen Kirjakauppa, 1962. Paper. [REVIEW]D. W. Hamlyn - 1963 - The Classical Review 13 (3):343-343.
  19. Dorothea Frede: Aristoteles und die ‘Seeschlacht’: das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9. Pp. 129. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1970. Paper DM. 24. [REVIEW]Pamela M. Huby - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (2):272-272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Aristotle’s Two Accounts of Relatives in Categories 7.Matthew Duncombe - 2015 - Phronesis 60 (4):436-461.
    AtCategories7, 6a36-7 Aristotle defines relatives, but at 8a13-28 worries that the definition may include some substances. Aristotle introduces a second account of relatives to solve the problem. Recent commentators have held that Aristotle intends to solve the extensional adequacy worry by restricting the extension of relatives. That is, R2 counts fewer items as relative than R1. However, this cannot explain Aristotle’s attitude to relatives, since he immediately returns to using R1. I propose a non-extensional reading. R1 and R2 do not (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21. Wayne N. Thompson: Aristotle's Deduction and Induction: Introductory Analysis and Synthesis. Pp. 114. Amsterdam: Rodopi N.V., 1975. Paper, Fl. 20. [REVIEW]Pamela Huby - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):125-125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Jaakko Hintikka: Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality. Pp. Ix + 225. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Cloth, £5·50. [REVIEW]W. E. W. St G. Charlton - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (2):280-280.
  23. Klaus Schickert: Die Form der Widerlegung Beim Frühen Aristoteles. Pp. Xiv + 111. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1977. Paper, DM. 32. [REVIEW]Pamela Huby - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (2):319-319.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Aristotle on Scientific Knowledge - R. D. McKirihan: Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science. Pp. Xiv + 340. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992. Cased, £35. [REVIEW]J. D. G. Evans - 1994 - The Classical Review 44 (1):84-85.
  25. J. Allen: Inference From Signs: Ancient Debates About the Nature of Evidence. Pp. Xi + 279. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. Cased, £30. ISBN: 0-19-825094-0. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barnes - 2002 - The Classical Review 52 (2):375-376.
  26. Crivelli Aristotle on Truth. Pp. Xii + 340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Cased, £50, US$85. ISBN: 0-521-82328-5. [REVIEW]Jean-Baptiste Gourinat - 2006 - The Classical Review 56 (1):65-66.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Dire et penser dans le principe psychologique de non-contradiction d'Aristote.Fabien Schang - 2005 - [email protected] Electroniques de [email protected] [email protected].
    Un paralogisme semble commis dans la démonstration par Aristote du principe psychologique de non-contradiction : à partir d’un principe performatif d’assertion (dire quelque chose, c’est le croire), une approche moderne nous incline à prétendre qu’Aristote présuppose une transparence référentielle des contextes opaques de croyance afin de corréler les versions psychologique et logique. Nous tenterons de restituer la preuve du principe (I). Au moyen de la formalisation moderne, nous appliquerons cette explication à quelques paradoxes (II). Nous en conclurons la nature de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Aristotle on Use of Homonymy in the Rhetoric.Mikołaj Domaradzki - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (2):333-346.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Aristotle on Secondary Substance.John Robert Mahlan - 2019 - Apeiron 52 (2):167-197.
    At the beginning of Categories 5, Aristotle distinguishes between two kinds of substance: primary substance and secondary substance. Primary substances include particular living organisms, inanimate objects, and their parts. Secondary substances are the species and genera of these. This distinction is unique to the Categories, which raises the question of why Aristotle treats species and genera as substances. I argue that Aristotle has two distinct reasons for doing so, and contrast my interpretation with recent alternatives. On my view, species and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Aristotle on Principles as Elements.Marko Malink - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53.
  31. Empty Negations and Existential Import in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2018 - Apeiron 51 (2):201-219.
    Aristotle draws what are, by our lights, two unusual relationships between predication and existence. First, true universal affirmations carry existential import. If ‘All humans are mortal’ is true, for example, then at least one human exists. And secondly, although affirmations with empty terms in subject position are all false, empty negations are all true: if ‘Socrates’ lacks a referent, then both ‘Socrates is well’ and ‘Socrates is ill’ are false but both ‘Socrates is not well’ and ‘Socrates is not ill’ (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Zoran Bodies of Speech: Text and Textuality in Aristotle. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014. Pp. Xv + 256. £47.99. 9781443860628. [REVIEW]Kleanthis Mantzouranis - 2016 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 136:288-289.
  33. There is Beauty Here, Too: Aristotle's Rhetoric for Science.John Poulakos & Nathan Crick - 2012 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 45 (3):295.
  34. Aristotle on Truth-Bearers.David Charles & Michail Peramatzis - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50:101-141.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  35. A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle.Jacob Rosen & Marko Malink - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42:179-261.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36. Syllogism, Demonstration, and Definition in Aristotle's Topics and Posterior Analytics.James Allen - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40:63-90.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. The Principle of Bivalence in De Interpretatione 4.Francesco Ademollo - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38:97-113.
  38. A Non-Extensional Notion of Conversion in the Organon.Marko Malink - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 37:105-141.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  39. Aristotle on the Necessity of Opposites in Posterior Analytics.Richard Tierney - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32:139-166.
  40. Seriality and Demonstration in Aristotle's Ontology.Kyle Fraser - 2003 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24:131-158.
  41. Interpreting Aristotle's Contingency-Syllogistic.Paul Thom - 1994 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12:91-109.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Platonic and Aristotelian Influences in the Philosophy of Language: A Case for the Priority of the Cratylus.Hayden Kee - 2016 - Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 32:72-82.
    Aristotle’s De Interpretatione has been referred to as the most influential text to be written in the history of semantics. I argue, however, that it is Plato who lays the foundation for subsequent reflection on signification. In the Cratylus, Plato confronts the two prevalent views of his time on the nature of the relationship between a name and a thing named: conventionalism, which holds that there is an arbitrary, imposed relationship between names and what they name; and naturalism, which holds (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Use and Theory of Metaphora.Margarita Vega - 2017 - Apeiron 50 (2):135-151.
    Journal Name: Apeiron Issue: Ahead of print.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Metaphor and the Logicians From Aristotle to Cajetan.E. Jennifer Ashworth - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (2):311-327.
    I examine the treatment of metaphor by medieval logicians and how it stemmed from their reception of classical texts in logic, grammar, and rhetoric. I consider the relation of the word 'metaphor' to the notions of translatio and transumptio, and show that it is not always synonymous with these. I also show that in the context of commentaries on the Sophistical Refutations metaphor was subsumed under equivocation. In turn, it was linked with the notion of analogy not so much in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45. Sobre a natureza Das proposições silogísticas em aristóteles.António Pedro Mesquita - 2006 - Philosophica 28:15-32.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Medieval Commentators on Future Contingents in De Interpretatione 9.Simo Knuuttila - 2010 - Vivarium 48 (1):75-95.
    This article considers three medieval approaches to the problem of future contingent propositions in chapter 9 of Aristotle's _De interpretatione_. While Boethius assumed that God's atemporal knowledge infallibly pertains to historical events, he was inclined to believe that Aristotle correctly taught that future contingent propositions are not antecedently true or false, even though they may be characterized as true-or-false. Aquinas also tried to combine the allegedly Aristotelian view of the disjunctive truth-value of future contingent propositions with the conception of all (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47. Zur Einheit der Modalen Syllogistik des Aristoteles.Klaus J. Schmidt - 2008 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):54-86.
    On the unity of modal syllogistics in Aristotle. The goal of this paper is an interpretation of Aristotle's modal syllogistics closely oriented on the text using the resources of modern modal predicate logic. Modern predicate logic was successfully able to interpret Aristotle's assertoric syllogistics uniformly, that is, with one formula for universal premises. A corresponding uniform interpretation of modal syllogistics by means of modal predicate logic is not possible. This thesis does not imply that a uniform view is abandoned. However, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts.Lynne Spellman - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (4):688-692.
  49. Richard Bosley, "Aspects of Aristotle's Logic". [REVIEW]Robin Smith - 1976 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (3):361.
  50. "Aristotle on Dialectic: "The" Topics. "Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum", Ed. G. E. L. Owen. [REVIEW]William Kneale - 1970 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 8 (2):201.
1 — 50 / 1077