This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related

Contents
26 found
Order:
  1. «Αρετή» και «σπουδαίος πολίτης» στα Ηθικά Ευδήμεια του Αριστοτέλη (Virtue and Virtuous Citizen in Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics).Tasioula Angelike - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Ioannina
  2. Complete Life in the Eudemian Ethics.Hilde Vinje - 2023 - Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 53 (2):299–323.
    In the Eudemian Ethics II 1, 1219a34–b8, Aristotle defines happiness as ‘the activity of a complete life in accordance with complete virtue’. Most scholars interpret a complete life as a whole lifetime, which means that happiness involves virtuous activity over an entire life. This article argues against this common reading by using Aristotle’s notion of ‘activity’ (energeia) as a touchstone. It argues that happiness, according to the Eudemian Ethics, must be a complete activity that reaches its end at any and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. The Function Argument in the Eudemian Ethics.Roy C. Lee - 2022 - Ancient Philosophy 42 (1):191-214.
    This paper reconstructs the function argument of Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics 2.1. The argument seeks to define happiness through the method of division; shows that the highest good is better than all four of the goods of the soul, not only two, as commentators have thought; and unlike the Nicomachean argument, makes the highest good definitionally independent of the human function.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. The Relation Between Logos and Thumos: An analysis of EN VII.6 1149a24–b3.Duane Long - 2022 - Rhizomata 10 (1):94-117.
    At EN VII.6 1149a24-b3, Aristotle offers an argument for the conclusion that akrasia due to thumos is less shameful than akrasia due to epithumia. The reasoning in this argument is obscure, for Aristotle makes two claims in particular that are difficult to understand; first, that in some way thumos “hears” reason when it leads to akrasia, and second, that thumos responds to what it hears “as if having syllogized” to a conclusion about how to act. This paper argues that previous (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Neither Virtue Nor Vice: Akratic and Enkratic Values in and beyond the Eudemian Ethics.Jozef Müller - 2022 - In Giulio Di Basilio (ed.), Investigating the Relationship Between Aristotle's Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics. London and New York: Issues in Ancient Philosophy. pp. 137-155.
  6. Aristotle on the Voluntary in the Eudemian Ethics.Gagan Sapkota - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
  7. Eudaimonia in the Eudemian Ethics.Daniel Ferguson - 2021 - Dissertation, Yale University
  8. Gli eph'hemin e l'involontario nell'Etica Eudemia: gli aspetti giuridici e sociali della responsabilità morale in Aristotele.Flavia Farina - 2020 - Dissertation, Università Degli Studi Roma Tre
  9. On the So-Called Common Books of the Eudemian and the Nicomachean Ethics.Dorothea Frede - 2019 - Phronesis 64 (1):84-116.
  10. The Aim of Eudemian Ethics ii 6-9.Daniel Wolt - 2019 - Ancient Philosophy 39 (1):137-149.
  11. The (In)Voluntary in the Timaeus and the Eudemian Ethics.Daniel Wolt - 2019 - Apeiron 52 (3):245-272.
    Plato’s Timaeus contains an argument that vice is involuntary. Here I present an interpretation of that argument and, upon doing so, relate the underlying conception of voluntariness to that found in Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics. I argue that in the Timaeus, for something to be voluntary it must be caused by the agent’s intellect in a certain way. This idea, in turn, relies on an identification of the agent with her intellect: the reason that what is voluntary must be caused by (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12. On A Curious Passage in Eudemian Ethics ii 6.Sylvia Berryman - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (1):137-150.
  13. EE II 2 1220a39–b6.Paulo Ferreira - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20 (1):123-40.
    Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics has always proved to be fertile ground for at times needless textual emendation. I provide a translation and running commentary on Eudemian Ethics II 2 1220a39–b6 in accordance with the MSS text.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14. O que é "verdadeiro, mas não esclarecedor" segundo a Ética Eudêmia.Raphael Zillig - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:231-254.
    In Eudemian Ethics I 6, Aristotle describes the progress of the ethical investigation as a drift from a) what is true but not clarifying to b) what is true and clarifying. The drift from a) to b) is usually interpreted as the overcome of a first obscure and confused grasp of the subject by a more accurate and reliable account. In this paper, I claim that the understanding of the methodological role of a) depends upon its dissociation from the notions (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15. Arystotelesowskie ujęcie homonimii.Mikołaj Domaradzki - 2016 - Diametros 50:1-24.
    The purpose of the paper is to discuss Aristotle’s account of homonymy. The major thesis advocated here is that Aristotle considers both entities and words to be homonymous, depending on the object of his criticism. Thus, when he takes issue with Plato, he tends to view homonymy more ontologically, upon which it is entities that become homonymous. When, on the other hand, he gainsays the exegetes or the sophists, he is inclined to perceive homonymy more semantically, upon which it is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. Phainomena as Witnesses and Examples: The Methodology of Eudemian Ethics 1.6.Joseph Karbowski - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49:196-226.
  17. Agency and Responsibility in Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics.Jozef Müller - 2015 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 60 (2):206-251.
    I defend two main theses. First, I argue that Aristotle’s account of voluntary action focuses on the conditions under which one is the cause of one’s actions in virtue of being (qua) the individual one is. Aristotle contrasts voluntary action not only with involuntary action but also with cases in which one acts (or does something) due to one’s nature (for example, in virtue of being a member of a certain species) rather than due to one’s own desires (i.e. qua (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  18. The eudemian ethics - Kenny Aristotle: The eudemian ethics. Pp. xxxviii + 195. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2011. Paper, £8.99, us$14.95. Isbn: 978-0-19-958643-1. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Jost - 2014 - The Classical Review 64 (1):73-75.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Phainomena e explicação na Ética Eudêmia de Aristóteles.Raphael Zillig - 2014 - In Conocimiento, ética y estética en la Filosofía Antigua: Actas del II Simposio Nacional de Filosofía Antigua. Rosário, Argentina: Asociación Argentina de Filosofía Antigua. pp. 330-336.
  20. O "Melhor" no âmbito da ação humana – Ética Eudêmia I 8.Raphael Zillig - 2012 - Dissertatio 36:299-316.
    Neste trabalho, pretendemos investigar como deve ser compreendida a questão “o que é o melhor?”, enunciada por Aristóteles no início de Ética Eudêmia I 8. Pretendemos, com isso, determinar quais são as suposições a partir das quais Aristóteles aborda essa pergunta em I 8, qual o tipo de resposta que a ela deve ser fornecida e como essa questão insere-se na investigação desenvolvida nos capítulos anteriores. Sustentaremos que, em I 8, Aristóteles pretende dar continuidade à tarefa que é iniciada em (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21. The Eudemian Ethics.A. Kenny (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
    The Eudemian Ethics is a major treatise on moral philosophy whose central concern is what makes life worth living. This is the first time it has been published in its entirety in any modern language. Anthony Kenny's fine translation is accompanied by a lucid introduction and explanatory notes.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  22. An Oct of the EE R. R. Walzer, J. M. Mingay (edd.): Aristotelis Ethica Eudemia. (Oxford Classical Texts.) Pp. xx + 162. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. £13.50. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barnes - 1992 - The Classical Review 42 (01):27-31.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Eudemian Ethics Books I, Ii, and Viii.Michael Woods (ed.) - 1992 - Clarendon Press.
    Anyone seriously interested in Aristotle's moral philosophy must take full account of the Eudemian Ethics, a work which has in the past been unduly neglected in favour of the Nicomachean Ethics. The relation between the two treatises is now the subject of lively debate. This volume contains a translation of three of the eight books of the Eudemian Ethics - those that are likely to be of most interest to philosophers today - together with a philosophical commentary on these books (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  24. Aristotle's Eudemian ethics, books I, II, and VIII. Aristotle - 1982 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by M. J. Woods.
    It has long been recognized that anyone seriously interested in Aristotle's moral philosophy will need to take full account of the Eudemian Ethics, a work still gravely neglected in favor of the better-known Nicomachean Ethics. The relation between the two continues to be the subject oflively scholarly debate. This volume contains a translation of three of the eight books of the Eudemian Ethics--those that are likely to be of most interest to philosophers today--together with a philosophical commentary on these books (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25. Éthique a Eudème. [REVIEW]G.-L. A. - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (4):735-736.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Jackson on the Eudemian Ethics. [REVIEW]H. Richards - 1901 - The Classical Review 15 (6):319-319.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark