Results for 'Frans Hendrik van Eemeren'

(not author) ( search as author name )
1000+ found
Order:
  1. Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard & Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.) - 2003 - Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    This volume contains a selection of papers from the International Conference on Argumentation by prominent international scholars of argumentation theory. It provides an insightful cross-section of the current state of affairs in argumentation research. It will be of interest to all those working in the field of argumentation theory and to all scholars who are interested in recent developments in this field.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  2
    From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild. A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
    This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, held in Amsterdam in July 2018. The chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  40
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Mark Aakhus - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):489-492.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  33
    Frans H. Van Eemeren (2012): Maniobras Estratégicas En El Discurso Argumentativo. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Editorial Plaza y Valdés (Series “Theoria Cum Praxi”, No. 9). Spanish Translation, by Cristián Santibáñez and María Elena Molina, Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren (2010): Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (Series “Argumentation in Context”, No. 2). [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):129-132.
    Each one of the five books authored or co-authored by Frans van Eemeren which have so far been translated into Spanish clearly fulfills a different role. Following the chronological order, we first have Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984; Spanish translation 2013), a book that contains the theoretical spadework in the field of pragmatics on which the whole edifice of pragma-dialectics is erected. Then follows Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies (van Eemeren and Grootendorst (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge 2004.Maciej Koszowski - 2007 - Roczniki Filozoficzne:303-309.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation: John Benjamins Publishing Company, Argumentation in Context , Vol. 2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2010, XII + 308 Pp. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
  8. Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A.(Eds.), Willard Argumentation Illuminated.R. C. Pinto - 1996 - Argumentation 10:414-419.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  32
    Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Karen Tracy - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):253-258.
  10.  14
    Frans H. Van Eemeren (Ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):355-359.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]J. M. Makau - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28:426-430.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  29
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen .Exploring Argumentative Contexts. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2014 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (2):199-218.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  39
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Et Alia, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):127-133.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse.F. J. Kauffeld - 1996 - Argumentation 10:129-137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  59
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.
  16.  16
    Frans H. Van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, 2018, Volume 33 of the Argumentation Library, 193 Pp, ISBN: 1566-7650.Peng Wu - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):609-614.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  10
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Ton Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  1
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: Argumentation Between Doctors and Patients: Understanding Clinical Argumentative Discourse.Lei Zhu & Wei Wang - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-6.
    The latest book is a timely application of the Pragma-Dialectical argumentative approach to medical consultation. The book consists of six chapters, which are concerned with topics pertaining to resolving differences of the opinion in doctor-patient interaction. With the publication of the book, the authors have made new contributions to the field of doctor-patient argumentative discourse.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  40
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  3
    Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory: Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 35), 2020, 289 pp.Fernando Leal - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):389-397.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  15
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Wu Peng : Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics: John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2017. Volume 12 of the Argumentation in Context Series, Ix, 367 Pp, ISBN: 9789027211293 , €99.00, ISBN: 9789027264800 , €99.00.Sally Jackson - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):293-299.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  28
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation: 2nd Edition, Routledge, New York and London, 2017, 174 Pp.Sara Greco - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (1):151-153.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  14
    Frans H. van Eemeren .Maniobras Estratégicas en el Discurso Argumentativo. Plaza y Valdés-CSIC, seriestudia/monografías-Theoria cum Praxi. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2015 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (2):240-242.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach Reviewed By. [REVIEW]David Godden - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25 (1):72-75.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  69
    Review Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study: Springer: Dordrecht, 2007, Ix, 234 Pp. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):519-524.
    Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study Content Type Journal Article Pages 519-524 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9182-7 Authors Manfred Kienpointner, Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 4.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  33
    Review Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren : Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham , Springer , 880 Pp. [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):527-532.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  51
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday.F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) - 2006 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. (Brassart) Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Et Al., Fundamentals of Argumen-Tation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments (Manfred Kien). [REVIEW]Douglas N. Walton - 1998 - Argumentation 12:513-516.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  45
    Johan van Benthem, Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (Eds.), Logic and Argumentation.Robert W. Binkley - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (4):508-512.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  1
    Book Review: Frans H van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Youzhi Sun - 2020 - Discourse Studies 22 (4):533-535.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  29
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, ISBN: 978-90-481-9472-8 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9473-5 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9474-2. [REVIEW]Ton van Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Book Review: Frans H van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds), Exploring Argumentative Contexts. [REVIEW]Haipeng Hu - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (5):699-701.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  53
    Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory' by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
    Since the first volume appeared in 2005, the collection Controversies has brought together pieces of work related to the field of argumentation, giving particular attention to those that are concerned with theoretical and practical problems connected with discursive controversy and confrontation. Authors such as P. Barrotta, M. Dascal, S. Frogel, H. Chang and D. Walton had already either edited or written previous editions to the present volume (volume six) of the collection. F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  18
    Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
    The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  35.  6
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Tjark Kruiger, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  36.  7
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  37.  51
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules Content Type Journal Article Pages 375-381 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6 Authors Dale Hample, University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  27
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Editors Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015; Pp. 289. $139.00 eBook, $179.00 Hardcover. [REVIEW]Kaitlyn Haynal - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (1):92-96.
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. Pp. xiv, 1-293. ISBN 978-3-319-21102-2. eBook US$139.00, €118,99; Hardcover US$179.00, €147,69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  40.  9
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  41.  24
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  42.  17
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal communicative moves.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  43.  26
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
  44. Identifying Argumentation Schemes.Tjark Kruiger, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Tjark Kruiger, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  45.  5
    Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1999 - Discourse Studies 1 (4):479-497.
    This article reacts against the undesirable ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentative discourse. It argues that a sound evaluation of argumentation requires an analysis that reveals all aspects of the discourse pertinent to critical testing. To explain the rationale of the various moves made in the discourse and the strategic patterns behind them, not only the interlocutors' dialectical goals must be taken into account, but also their rhetorical goals. After explaining how rhetorical insight can be instrumental in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   112 citations  
  46.  1
    Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation.Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst & A. Francisca Sn Henkemans - 2015 - Routledge.
    This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from real-life discourse and texts. The basic principles are explained that are instrumental in the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. Methodical instruments are offered for identifying differences of opinion, analyzing and evaluating argumentation and presenting arguments in oral and written discourse. In addition, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  47.  24
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 271-291.
  48.  9
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Peter Houtlosser, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  49.  42
    Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):1-23.
    This paper serves as an introduction to the special issue on argumentative patterns in discourse, more in particular on argumentative patterns with pragmatic argumentation as a main argument that are prototypical of argumentative discourse in certain communicative activity types in the political, the legal, the medical, and the academic domain. It situates the studies of argumentative patterns reported in these papers in the pragma-dialectical research program. In order to be able to do so, it is first explained in which consecutive (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  50.  27
    Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):153-171.
    This theoretical expose explores the complex notion of argumentative style, which has so far been largely neglected in argumentation theory. After an introduction of the problems involved, the theoretical tools for identifying the properties of the discourse in which an argumentative style manifests itself are explained from a pragma-dialectical perspective and a theoretical definition of argumentative style is provided that does full justice to its role in argumentative discourse. The article concludes with a short reflection upon the next steps that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000