Japanese Philosophy

言葉の意味が変わってしまうのはなぜか。単語の指すものの内実が変わったり、同じものを指していたとしても受け止め方が変わったりする。同じ一つの文の意味も決してずっと同じであり続けるわけではない。このとき、 私たちにはいったい何が起きているのだろうか。この問いを、そもそも「意味」とは何なのか、「自己」や「出来事」とは何かといった哲学ではよく知られたさまざまな問題と交錯させながら追究する。.

埋もれていた、もう一つの「うひ山ぶみ」。 知られざる近世の和学手引き書『和学知辺草(わがくしるべぐさ)』、初の翻刻・注釈・現代語訳! 漢学では徂徠学が急速な衰えを見せ、朱子学が盛り返し、異学の禁が発令され、国学では真淵の学風を受け継いだ宣長の学問が完成期を迎えていた、寛政年間(一七八九〜一八〇一)。 和学の手引き書が、佐賀の地で作られていた。 著者は「幽林舎散人」。寛政三年秋に官職を解かれ、該書成立の時はすでに六十歳を迎えようとしていことが、自叙から知られるのみ。該博な学識を満載した本著作から、ひとかどの知識人と推察されるが、年代を考えると 、おそらく鍋島直嵩(一七五三~八三)の主導する歌壇および文芸サロンに身を置いた人物であろう。 果たして江戸や松坂の新知識はどう伝えられていたのか。 近世思想史、文学史を知るための必読の書。 執筆は、中尾友香梨、白石良夫、進藤康子、大久保順子、亀井森、土屋育子、中尾健一郎、沼尻利通、日高愛子、村上義明、二宮愛理、脇山真衣、(翻字)三ツ松誠、田中圭子、中山成一。.

「新しい知」のあり方を模索し続けた哲学者が、彼方に見ていたものは何か。豊饒な思想世界を読み解く。.

思想家・後藤新平は、「儒服をつけた英雄」蕃山から何を学んだのか? 百年先を読んだ政治家、後藤新平(1857-1929)の思想はどのようにして培われてきたのか。後藤新平が終生の愛読書としていた熊沢蕃山(1619-91)の『集義和書』を手がかりに、思想家・後藤新平の知ら れざる中枢に切り込む。.

進化論・国家有機体説から生命主義・歴史への回帰まで、デモクラシーと煩悶の時代における「国体」の地平.

西洋哲学に対峙した日本の二人の思索者は無や直観、時間や場所などの主題をめぐり何を共有し、どうすれ違ったのか。明晰な最新研究。.

「尊王攘夷」という言葉を生み出し、 倒幕運動の思想的背景ともなった、 儒教の歴史思想と水戸学の形成過程とは。.

江戸時代の儒学者・宗教者である山崎闇斎の思想を、心理学・文化人類学・現代哲学等を取り入れた学際的なアプローチで解明する。.

Nishida Kitaro is widely considered as the first original philosopher in modern Japan. Addressing this claim, Richard Stone critically examines Nishida's relation to his contemporary philosophers in the Meiji era (1868-1912), highlighting the continuity, difference and relationships between them. He argues that ideas starting from early Meiji philosophers were gradually given more rigorous treatment over the course of the era, eventually culminating in Nishida's early philosophy.The Origins of Modern Japanese Philosophy offers an engaging insight into the Meiji period, bringing Nishida's (...) work it into dialogue with his predecessors. (shrink)

Translated into English for the first time, leading Japanese philosopher, Nishihira Tadashi, explores the deeply experiential philosophy of losing yourself in the reality of the present. He takes us on a tour through the history of Zen, the gatekeeper of the philosophy of no-mind D.T. Suzuki, the Noh theory of Zeami and Takuan's treatise on swordsmanship. Nishihira pulls together the threads of this genealogy of no-mind, showing the richness of the concept and its essential connection to the paradoxical task of (...) becoming fully human. (shrink)

One of the central figures in the Kyoto School, Miki Kiyoshi wrote Logic of Imagination as a series of articles between 1937 and 1943. Translating this seminal work into English for the first time, with contextual notes throughout, this book features an introduction and biographical information about the author. Miki's thinking about the imagination illuminates our contemporary understanding of technology and how we behave in the world.

The Dialectics of Absolute Nothingness examines the influence of German philosophical traditions on the development of the Kyoto School. Contributors explore the Kyoto School's engagement with Western thought, highlighting the centrality of German philosophy while also showing the many ways the Kyoto School critiques the philosophical traditions it incorporates.

Most mainstream theories of selfhood and personhood in the European and North-American tradition, regardless of whether they are naturalistic or dualistic, presuppose an egocentric paradigm. This means, they assume that consciousness is primary in our conceptions of self and person. From its very beginning, the Buddhist traditions provide alternative models to this egocentric paradigm, be it the network model of early Buddhist scriptures, the distinctively phenomenological approaches of Yogācāra Buddhism, or the deconstructive approaches of Zen Buddhist thinkers and texts. The (...) philosophers of the Kyoto School have also inherited a critical stance towards the egocentric paradigm, whether intentionally or unintentionally. In this chapter, I will interrogate a plethora of approaches discussed in Japanese Buddhism and twentieth century Japanese philosophy. Concretely, I will introduce language developed by these philosophers to highlight four different modalities of the self, namely the thetic, a-thetic, bi-thetic, and non-thetic modalities. The goal is to envision a complex conception of consciousness that is relational rather than egocentric and that is grounded in a second-person, rather than a first- or a third-person, approach. The result will be an innovative conception of the self that is inspired by various philosophers in the Buddhist and/or Japanese philosophical traditions. (shrink)

The aim of this chapter is to focus on two representatives of Japanese philosophy: Nishida Kitarō, and Tanabe Hajime. More precisely, I shall compare their philosophies from the perspective of emotion or feeling. Nishida philosophy considers feeling to be essential, even incorporating it within the construction of his logic. Tanabe philosophy, meanwhile, avoided this kind of theoria, by pursuing a logic that emphasized thoroughgoing, practical action. However in the end, Tanabe persisted in his attempts to comprehend emotion or feeling in (...) a scholarly manner. (shrink)

「西欧」と「近代」を相対化し、今、エスニックの次元から『日本哲学』を創始すること=「われわれの問題に発して思索する」スタイルを提唱。.